Build, defend or charge for the thing that keeps customers from leaving.
24 of 31 judged decisions were never undone. In all but one walk-back, the first move was the company's own.
A moat is rarely stormed. It is drained by its owner, usually through a new price or a looser standard.
The fee Unity charged for its own success
On September 12, 2023, Unity, which makes software that many video games are built on, announced a new fee: a charge every time a game made with it was installed. The point was to collect more from the hit games it most needed to keep.
Ten days later Unity took the fee off its free tier and spared games built on older versions, with a public apology. Within a month its chief executive had retired. On September 12, 2024, a year to the day, Unity canceled the fee entirely and went back to charging per seat, with its Pro tier raised 8% to $2,200 a year.
Developers didn't leave all at once. In 2024, 51% of the games released on Steam still used Unity. But by revenue, games made with its rival Unreal took 31% of Steam sales against Unity's 26%, the first time Unreal had led since 2018.
That is the whole decision in one story. Unity's advantage was never one piece of code. It was every game already built on the engine and every developer who knew it. The fee tried to charge for that advantage, and in doing so put it up for grabs. The rest of this guide is about the companies that built, defended or spent an advantage like it, and what happened next.
What moat is
A moat is whatever keeps customers from leaving and rivals from copying you, even after everyone can see how you win. The decision is how to build one, how to defend it, and how much to charge for it.
Moats come in a few kinds. Some are networks that get more valuable as they grow, like a card network that every bank belongs to. Some are habits and skills, like the code millions of developers have already written for one company's chips. Some are brands, some are legal rights, and some are ownership structures that put control out of a bidder's reach. Each can be built, defended or spent, and the record has examples of all three.
Why it is so hard
On paper, protecting an advantage sounds like the easiest decision a company makes. In a real company, three things make it hard.
Nobody owns it
Revenue, margin and growth each have an owner with a target. The reason customers stay usually has no line in the plan, so it loses arguments on points.
It looks like pricing power
Customers who can't easily leave look like customers who will pay more. That is true up to a point, and nobody can see the point in advance.
Every test is public
A moat is only tested when someone pushes on it: a rival, a bidder, a court or the company itself. By then the push is in the open, and backing down is expensive.
The ways companies did it
The decisions on record take four shapes. Two make the advantage harder to take; two find out what it will bear.
Invest in what a rival can't copy quickly
Spend years on something a competitor would need years to match.
- Nvidia
- Introduced CUDA in November 2006, a platform for programming its chips for general computing. By its 2025 filing over 5.9 million developers used CUDA and its other tools, and its share of AI training exceeded 90%.
- Eli Lilly
- Began building factories for its drug tirzepatide in 2020, before any approval, on the view that capacity can't be built on a rival's timeline. Its U.S. manufacturing commitment since 2020 passed $50 billion, and by August 2024 every dose was available.
Put control out of reach
Build the advantage into who owns what, so no rival or bidder can simply buy it.
- Visa
- In June 1970 took its card program out of Bank of America's hands and reincorporated it as a company owned by the issuing banks together, turning rivals into co-owners. In fiscal 2024 it processed 234 billion transactions on its own rails.
- Hershey
- In 2016 its board unanimously rejected a roughly $23 billion bid from Mondelēz. A change of control would have handed its Kit Kat license back to Nestlé for free.
Make the law hold the wall
Use rules, patents or contracts to keep rivals out, and go to court to test them.
- American Express
- Refused to settle the government's case against its rules stopping merchants from steering customers to cheaper cards, as Visa and Mastercard had. In 2018 the Supreme Court ruled for it, 5-4. In 2024 it earned a record $10.13 billion on $65.95 billion of revenue.
- Moderna
- Sued Pfizer and BioNTech in August 2022 over three of its mRNA patents. The case was stayed in April 2024, and in March 2025 a patent board ruled every challenged claim in two of the three patents unpatentable.
Find out what the advantage will bear
Raise what customers pay, or ration what they can get.
- Ferrari
- Treats supply as a dial, keeping demand ahead of it. In 2024 it shipped 13,752 cars at a 38.3% EBITDA margin, and cut shipments to mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan by 328 cars to protect exclusivity.
- Delta Air Lines
- In September 2023 tied SkyMiles elite status mainly to credit-card spending. Its chief executive said the changes "probably went too far", and Delta walked key provisions back within months.
What 35 companies did
Here is every decision on record, placed by the year it was made and marked by how it turned out. Hover a mark, or open the table, for the company and the outcome.
35 defending an advantage decisions, 1891 to 2026
Each mark is one decision. "Never undone" means the company did not reverse it, not that it worked.
Show as a table
| Company | Year | Choice | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola | 1891 | Keep perpetual trade secret | Never undone |
| Caterpillar | 1925 | Independent dealer network | Never undone |
| Visa | 1970 | Issuer-owned cooperative | Never undone |
| Red Bull | 1984 | Sell meaning at premium | Never undone |
| Diageo | 1997 | Own the whole bar | Never undone |
| Crocs | 2006 | Acquire Jibbitz charm business | Never undone |
| Nvidia | 2006 | Fund a developer platform | Never undone |
| BMW | 2009 | Run the 'Joy' campaign | Walked back |
| PepsiCo | 2010 | Direct-store-delivery | Never undone |
| Apple | 2011 | Sue on design patents | Kept in part |
| Diageo | 2012 | Build the aging reserve | Kept in part |
| Etsy | 2013 | Allow outside manufacturers | Kept in part |
| Ferrari | 2014 | Managed scarcity dial | Never undone |
| Hershey | 2016 | Reject Mondelēz bid | Never undone |
| Palantir | 2016 | Sue the Army | Never undone |
| Crocs | 2017 | Cut to one hero clog | Never undone |
| American Express | 2018 | Litigate to Supreme Court | Never undone |
| Diageo | 2018 | Seek SWA permission | Never undone |
| L'Oreal | 2018 | Acquire ModiFace outright | Too early to call |
| Novo Nordisk | 2018 | Grow via GLP-1 molecule | Never undone |
| AMD | 2019 | Split compute and I/O | Never undone |
| Airbnb | 2020 | Suspend performance marketing | Never undone |
| Eli Lilly | 2020 | Build capacity at risk | Never undone |
| LVMH | 2021 | Close at renegotiated price | Never undone |
| Moderna | 2022 | Sue Pfizer and BioNTech | Never undone |
| Nvidia vs AMD | 2022 | Fund CUDA compatibility layer | Never undone |
| Adobe | 2023 | Abandon the deal | Never undone |
| Delta Air Lines | 2023 | Overhaul SkyMiles toward card spend | Kept in part |
| Unity | 2023 | Per-install runtime fee | Walked back |
| Ralph Lauren | 2024 | Exit discount wholesale | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2024 | Open the network | Never undone |
| Universal Music | 2024 | Pull catalog from TikTok | Kept in part |
| Airbnb | 2025 | Impose mandatory 15.5% fee | Too early to call |
| Roku | 2026 | Sell to Fox | Too early to call |
| Stripe | 2026 | Bid to acquire PayPal | Too early to call |
Of the 31 decisions that can be judged, 24 were never undone, 2 were walked back and 5 were kept only in part.
A few decisions are filed here but are really about something else, such as LVMH's 2021 purchase of Tiffany. Read them as neighbors of this decision.
The walk-backs
Put the walk-backs side by side and one thing stands out. Only one began with a rival pushing in: Apple's lawsuit over phones it said Samsung had copied. Every other one began with something the company did to its own advantage.
| Company | What it did | How it was undone | Kind of move |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2009 | Replaced The Ultimate Driving Machine with a Joy campaign in North America | Brought the old tagline back by 2012 | Swapped the promise |
| Apple2011 | Sued Samsung over three design patents covering the iPhone's look | Won $1.049 billion from a jury in 2012; the Supreme Court reversed the design-patent damages 8-0 in 2016, and the case settled in 2018 on undisclosed terms | Leaned on a legal wall |
| Diageo2012 | Committed roughly £1 billion to expand its Scotch capacity and build new warehousing | In September 2025 temporarily halted production at Balcones, George Dickel and TeaninichLeverage of 3.4x in fiscal 2025, outside its own target range | Built ahead of demand |
| Etsy2013 | Let sellers use outside manufacturers so the marketplace could scale | By 2024 was banning 3.5 million spam accounts and cutting off tools for listing mass-produced goodsMarketplace sales of $10.5 billion in 2025, 14% below the 2021 peak | Loosened the standard |
| Unity2023 | Charged developers a fee per game install | Canceled it in September 2024 and went back to charging per seatUnreal passed Unity in Steam game revenue, 31% to 26% | Changed what customers pay for |
| Delta Air Lines2023 | Tied SkyMiles elite status mainly to credit-card spending | Walked key provisions back within months | Changed what customers pay for |
| Universal Music2024 | Pulled its whole catalog from TikTok to force better terms | Came back in May 2024 with a deal whose financial terms were not disclosed | Tested its leverage |
The kind of move is Stratrix's reading of each case. Apple, Diageo, Etsy, Delta and Universal Music were kept only in part; BMW's and Unity's were undone.
In five of the rows the first move was a push on the company's own advantage: a new tagline, a looser standard, a new fee, a new rule for status, a blackout. The two that changed what customers pay for, Unity and Delta, were both pulled back within a year.
The other two show the limits of building and defending. Diageo locked capital into barrels on the bet that Scotch demand would keep climbing; its net sales in fiscal 2025 were flat at $20.2 billion, and in September 2025 it paused three distilleries. Apple won its case in front of a jury, and then the Supreme Court reversed the design-patent damages 8-0.
BMW's row is the strangest. Its North American sales rose during the Joy campaign, from 195,502 cars in 2009 to 220,113 in 2010, and it brought The Ultimate Driving Machine back by 2012 anyway. A good year was not enough to make the new promise worth more than the old one.
A moat is rarely stormed. It is usually drained by the company that owns it.
How to run this decision
If you are weighing a version of this choice, here is what the record suggests doing, in order.
- Write down why customers stay, in one sentence
Not the feature list and not the switching cost: the reason. If it takes a paragraph, nobody in the company will recognize an attack on it, including one from inside. BMW's reason was a promise about how its cars drive, and it set that promise aside for three years.
Seen in: BMW, 2009 - Name the part that is not for sale
Decide in advance which piece of the advantage stays off the table whatever the revenue case says, and write it where the people setting prices can see it. Etsy let sellers use outside manufacturers in 2013 to grow, and by 2024 was cutting off tools that let sellers list mass-produced goods.
Seen in: Etsy, 2013 - Treat a change in what customers pay for as a product change
Customers react to a new unit of price far more than to a higher number. Unity switched from charging per seat to charging per install, and Delta switched elite status from flying to card spending. Both pulled back within a year.
Seen in: Unity, 2023 · Delta Air Lines, 2023 - Build what a rival can't compress
The strongest advantages here took years to build and would take a rival years to copy: code written by developers, factories built and approved. Eli Lilly began building capacity for tirzepatide in 2020, before any approval, because capacity can't be built on a competitor's timeline.
Seen in: Eli Lilly, 2020 · Nvidia, 2006 - Test a legal wall before you lean on it
Patents and contract rules hold only until a court looks at them. American Express defended its merchant rules all the way to the Supreme Court and won, 5-4. Moderna sued over its mRNA patents, and two of the three had every challenged claim ruled unpatentable. Apple won $1.049 billion from a jury over the iPhone's design, and the Supreme Court later reversed the design-patent damages.
Seen in: American Express, 2018 · Moderna, 2022 · Apple, 2011 - Decide what a refusal looks like before you launch
Before a change that pushes on customers, define the reaction that would make you stop and the date you will read it. Unity revised its fee ten days after announcing it and canceled it a year later; deciding in advance would have been cheaper than deciding in public.
Seen in: Unity, 2023 - Know what a sale would do to the advantage
If part of the advantage sits in a contract or a structure, find out what a change of control would do to it before a bidder asks. Hershey's Kit Kat license would have gone back to Nestlé for free under new ownership, and its board unanimously rejected a roughly $23 billion bid from Mondelēz in 2016.
Seen in: Hershey, 2016 · Visa, 1970
To work the numbers for your own case, read Competitive moat analysis: how to test whether your advantage is real.
Warning signs
What it has looked like when this decision was going wrong.
- The proposal changes what customers pay for, not just how much.Unity, 2023 · Delta Air Lines, 2023
- A long-running brand promise is being replaced because leadership has a better idea.BMW, 2009
- The standard that defines the product is relaxed so the network can grow faster.Etsy, 2013
- The advantage rests on patents nobody has tested in court.Moderna, 2022
- The plan assumes a partner needs you more than you need it.Universal Music, 2024
All 35 cases
Each case is one company at one decision: what was on the table, what it chose, why, and what followed, with every fact sourced.
Never undone · 24
- Coca-Cola, 1891Keep perpetual trade secret
- Caterpillar, 1925Independent dealer network
- Visa, 1970Issuer-owned cooperative
- Red Bull, 1984Sell meaning at premium
- Diageo, 1997Own the whole bar
- Crocs, 2006Acquire Jibbitz charm business
- Nvidia, 2006Fund a developer platform
- PepsiCo, 2010Direct-store-delivery
- Ferrari, 2014Managed scarcity dial
- Hershey, 2016Reject Mondelēz bid
- Palantir, 2016Sue the Army
- Crocs, 2017Cut to one hero clog
- American Express, 2018Litigate to Supreme Court
- Diageo, 2018Seek SWA permission
- Novo Nordisk, 2018Grow via GLP-1 molecule
- AMD, 2019Split compute and I/O
- Airbnb, 2020Suspend performance marketing
- Eli Lilly, 2020Build capacity at risk
- LVMH, 2021Close at renegotiated price
- Moderna, 2022Sue Pfizer and BioNTech
- Nvidia vs AMD, 2022Fund CUDA compatibility layer
- Adobe, 2023Abandon the deal
- Ralph Lauren, 2024Exit discount wholesale
- Tesla, 2024Open the network
Kept in part · 5
- Apple, 2011Sue on design patents
- Diageo, 2012Build the aging reserve
- Etsy, 2013Allow outside manufacturers
- Delta Air Lines, 2023Overhaul SkyMiles toward card spend
- Universal Music, 2024Pull catalog from TikTok
Walked back · 2
- BMW, 2009Run the 'Joy' campaign
- Unity, 2023Per-install runtime fee
Too early to call · 4
- L'Oreal, 2018Acquire ModiFace outright
- Airbnb, 2025Impose mandatory 15.5% fee
- Roku, 2026Sell to Fox
- Stripe, 2026Bid to acquire PayPal
Questions
- What is a moat in business?
- Whatever keeps customers from leaving and rivals from copying a company, even when its strategy is plain to see. Networks, developer habits, brands, legal rights and ownership structures are all moats in this guide.
- What are examples of companies with strong moats?
- Visa, whose 1970 structure made the issuing banks co-owners of its network; Nvidia, with over 5.9 million developers using CUDA; Caterpillar, with its network of independent dealers; and Ferrari, which keeps demand for its cars ahead of supply on purpose.
- How do companies lose their moats?
- In this guide, mostly by their own hand. Most of the decisions that were walked back began with the company changing what customers paid for, relaxing its own standard, pulling its catalog from a partner, or replacing its own brand promise.
- How do you build a moat?
- By investing early in something a rival cannot copy quickly: a developer platform, manufacturing capacity, a dealer network or an ownership structure. The examples on record took years to show up in results.
More from Stratrix
“What would it actually cost a challenger to take your customer?”
See the pack — $499 →All Access
Every Casebook, three Strategy Packs a seat each year and the Analyst, for teams that face these decisions all year.
$1,999 a year · $499 a seatWhat is included →Test a decision, free
Set a live decision against the companies that made it before you.
AcquisitionsThe Distance TestDivestituresThe Divestiture TestDiversificationThe Diversification TestMake or buyThe Make-or-Buy TestNew analyses, by email
The defining moves in business, checked against the record, as they publish.