Licensed to an organization: checkout asks for the company the purchase is for, its website, and an email address to deliver the files to. A work address is best for the license record; a personal one is accepted. Digital download. All sales are final: no refunds or returns. Each format can be downloaded 3 times, and the links stay valid for 30 days. If you need more, reply to your confirmation email and we will sort it out.
Most moat analysis is a retrospective explanation of why a company earns good returns, presented as a prediction that it will keep earning them. This pack replaces the taxonomy with an inequality: a moat is the gap between what a challenger would have to spend to take one of your customers and what that customer would then be worth to them. It names which of four sources produces that gap, what erodes each — in three cases out of four, somebody who is not competing with you — and computes the arithmetic where it actually lives, which is in the challenger's numbers rather than yours.
What is the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack
The Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack is a complete decision-support kit for one question: what would it actually cost a challenger to take your customer? It is built around one organizing test: which of the four sources produces the gap, and what erodes it. Sixteen files carry it: the foundations, a concept deck, a scored decision wizard, a challenger model blank and worked, the moves that widen each source, nine sourced case studies, a fit worksheet, a roadmap template, a practitioner manual, a field checklist, and an orientation page.
The test that runs through every file
Which of the four sources produces the gap, and what erodes it. It is the argument in the deck, it becomes the wizard’s axes, it drives the model’s inputs, and it reappears as lines on the checklist. That is what makes 16 files a product rather than 16 documents.
The model resolves to one number you can negotiate with: The challenger's gap — what taking your customer costs a challenger, less what it earns them. It ships blank and worked, and every input is a named cell rather than a figure buried inside a formula, so the number arrives with its assumptions attached rather than on its own authority.
Why most moat analysis proves nothing
A company earning good returns always has an explanation for them. Turning that explanation into a claim about the future requires a different document, and the usual taxonomy does not supply it: switching costs, scale, network effects, and brand describe how protection is produced, not whether it is still being produced or for how much longer.
This pack replaces the taxonomy with an inequality, what a challenger must spend against what your customer earns them, and moves the arithmetic into their spreadsheet, where the answer actually lives.
How to tell which source produces your gap
| The source | What erodes it | Where you see it first |
|---|---|---|
| Switching friction | A third party builds the migration path. | Migration tooling appears, priced well below what you assumed a move would cost. |
| Scale economics | A supplier makes the capability rentable. | A smaller competitor holds a comparable unit cost. Ask how; the answer is a supplier's name. |
| Demand-side returns | Multi-homing, once a customer can use both without penalty. | Accounts running you alongside somebody else and calling it a trial that never ends. |
| Access | The channel changes, or the rule does. | A new route to your customer that does not pass through the thing you control. |
What is in the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack
- Foundations. The framework: the inequality, the four sources and what erodes each, the three challenger profiles, and the affordable inducement.
- Concept deck. Twenty-one slides for a leadership session, with the sourced cases and what they do not establish.
- Decision wizard. Eight scored questions returning the source of the gap, the band, and either of the two halt conditions.
- Challenger model. Ten periods in a challenger's numbers, run three times, resolving to the gap, the inducement each can afford, and the year it closes.
- Strategies and tactics. The moves that widen each source, the move that clears each halt, and the ones that are wasted on a source you do not have.
- Case studies. Nine sourced positions read through the four sources, with what each case does and does not establish.
- Fit worksheet. The single page of record: the source, the two halts, the gap by challenger, what erodes it, who signed.
- Roadmap template. Five phases with gates and owners, the assumptions register, and the erosion triggers.
- Practitioner manual. The watchlist, who owns which indicator, the premium test, six failure modes and their leading indicators.
- Field checklist. The one-pager that survives outside the binder.
- About the package. What each file does and the order to run them.
Who the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack is for
A chief executive or board about to price next year's plan to a premium no one has verified; the strategy team asked to prove the advantage is durable and reaching for the taxonomy; the CFO who suspects the discount on competitive deals has been rising for three years; an investor testing whether a moat claim is a prediction or an explanation; and the adviser who would otherwise start from a blank page. It is worth buying when a real decision is in front of you. It is not worth buying to read.
An honest note on fit
This is a kit for running a decision, not a research report and not a course. Worked examples use an explicitly fictional company with numbers tuned to teach rather than to flatter: in the worked case the gap holds for all ten years against a startup, for five against the neighbor, and for one against an entrant earning its return elsewhere. Nothing about the company changes between those three readings — only whose spreadsheet the arithmetic is done in.
One limit is stated on the page rather than worked around, and it is more severe here than in any other pack in this series. Moats are identified by their returns, so any collection of them is selected on the outcome it is being used to explain, and the businesses with the same mechanism and no returns are invisible. The case set supports recognizing a mechanism. It cannot support a survival rate, and the pack does not claim one.
This decision, in two minutes
Short videos on companies that faced it, built from the casebooks this pack draws on.
The free guide to this decision
How companies ran this decision, case by case, and the method the pack is built on. Read the guide →
Questions about the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack
- Do I need competitive intelligence data to use the model?
- No, and that is deliberate. The inputs come from public pricing, published margins where a challenger is listed, your own lost-deal records, and five conversations with your own customers about what leaving would cost them. The hardest input is the last one and it is the cheapest to obtain. Nothing here requires a subscription to a data provider or a commissioned study.
- What is the number the model produces?
- The gap: what it costs a challenger to win one of your customers, less what that customer is then worth to them. It is computed three times: against a startup, against a neighbor who already sells to your customer, and against an entrant earning its return elsewhere. It produces two more figures: the largest inducement each challenger can afford to pay your customer to move, and the year that inducement clears what a move actually costs them.
- Are the case studies real companies?
- Yes. Nine sourced positions, dated, mapped to the source of the gap, and each stating what its evidence does not establish. One of the nine argues against the framework and is in the set for that reason. The worked model, wizard, and worksheet use an explicitly fictional company, labeled as such on every file, with numbers tuned to teach rather than to flatter.
- Our advantage is our brand. Does this pack still apply?
- Yes, and the first question it asks is which of the four sources the brand actually produces. If it means customers accept a higher price with no alternative seriously considered, it is producing switching friction and the pack prices it. If it means a channel gives you access a challenger cannot get, it is producing access. If it produces none of the four, the pack says so, which is uncomfortable and is the point.
- How long does it take to run?
- A leadership team can work through the deck and the wizard in one session. The model takes a working day to populate honestly and two more weeks to populate well, because the inputs belong to somebody else. The premium test is worth running first: one analyst, one week, your own deal records. If the competitive discount is already rising, the crossing has happened and the question changes.
- Is this a subscription?
- No. It is a one-time purchase of a single-organization license, with no seat limit inside your organization and nothing to cancel.
- What is the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack?
- The Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack is a decision-support kit for one question: What would it actually cost a challenger to take your customer? It contains 16 files — foundations, concept deck, decision wizard, challenger model, strategies and tactics, case studies, fit worksheet, roadmap template, practitioner manual, field checklist, about the package — built around a single organizing test: which of the four sources produces the gap, and what erodes it. It is what a leadership team uses to run the decision and leave a record of what they assumed, rather than a report about the topic.
- Who is the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack for?
- Anyone who has to make this call and answer for it: an operator or owner facing the decision, the executive team running it, the board or investor testing the reasoning, or an adviser who would otherwise build the framework from a blank page. It is worth buying when a real decision is in front of you. It is not worth buying to read.
- What is in the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack?
- 16 files in Word, PDF, PowerPoint and Excel: Foundations (Word + PDF) — The framework: the inequality, the four sources and what erodes each, the three challenger profiles, and the affordable inducement. Concept deck (PowerPoint + PDF) — Twenty-one slides for a leadership session, with the sourced cases and what they do not establish. Decision wizard (Excel) — Eight scored questions returning the source of the gap, the band, and either of the two halt conditions. Challenger model (Excel, blank and worked) — Ten periods in a challenger's numbers, run three times, resolving to the gap, the inducement each can afford, and the year it closes. Strategies and tactics (Word) — The moves that widen each source, the move that clears each halt, and the ones that are wasted on a source you do not have. Case studies (Word) — Nine sourced positions read through the four sources, with what each case does and does not establish. Fit worksheet (Word, blank and worked) — The single page of record: the source, the two halts, the gap by challenger, what erodes it, who signed. Roadmap template (Word) — Five phases with gates and owners, the assumptions register, and the erosion triggers. Practitioner manual (Word + PDF) — The watchlist, who owns which indicator, the premium test, six failure modes and their leading indicators. Field checklist (PDF) — The one-pager that survives outside the binder. About the package (PDF) — What each file does and the order to run them.
- What number does the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack produce?
- The challenger's gap — what taking your customer costs a challenger, less what it earns them. The model ships blank and worked, and every input is a named cell rather than a figure buried inside a formula, so the number you take into a room arrives with its assumptions attached and can be argued with rather than merely believed.
- How is the Moat Anatomy Strategy Pack delivered?
- As a single download of all 16 files, immediately after payment, with the same link sent by email. It can be downloaded 3 times and the link is valid for 30 days. There is nothing to install and no account to keep.