Raise the price, cut it, change what it is charged for, or ration instead of pricing.
38 of 51 judged decisions were never undone. 6 were walked back and 7 were kept only in part.
The price changes that were walked back started from what the company needed. The ones that held gave customers something to compare the new price with.
A nickel for seventy-three years
For 73 years, from 1886 to 1959, a 6.5-ounce bottle of Coca-Cola cost five cents. Not because Coca-Cola decided, every year, that five cents was right. Because it could not change it.
In 1899, wanting to grow without paying for bottling plants, Coca-Cola had sold the bottling rights and supplied the syrup on fixed terms. That contract encouraged a fixed shelf price. Vending machines took a single coin. A price between a nickel and a dime was close to impossible.
In 1953 Coca-Cola's president, Robert Woodruff, asked his friend President Eisenhower to have the U.S. Treasury mint a 7.5-cent coin. The request was declined. The nickel finally broke at the end of the 1950s.
Now set that beside Amazon Prime. In 2011 Amazon added streaming video to the bundle for free. In March 2014 it raised the annual fee from $79 to $99, and in 2022 from $119 to $139. By 2021 Prime had more than 200 million members. Each rise landed on a richer bundle, so members compared it with a better product than the one they had signed up for.
That is the whole decision in two stories. A price is never just a number. It is tied up in contracts, machines, habits and, above all, in what customers compare it with. This guide is about moving it anyway.
What pricing strategy is
A pricing strategy is a company's choice of what to charge, for what, and how that changes over time. A pricing decision is any deliberate change to it: raising, cutting, changing what the price is charged for, or rationing instead of pricing.
The last two matter more than they sound. Charging per employee instead of per user, or by subscription instead of once, changes what the customer thinks they are buying, not just how much. And some companies, like Hermès and Ferrari, decide who gets to buy before they decide what to charge.
Why it is so hard
A price is the easiest thing in a company to change on paper. Three things make it hard in practice.
A price is built into everything around it
Contracts, machines, sales teams and habits all assume today's number. Coca-Cola's nickel was held in place by a bottler contract and by vending machines that took one coin.
Customers judge a price by comparing it
With a rival, with last year, with what they used to get for free. Spotify kept its U.S. price at $9.99 for more than a decade, and raised it in July 2023 after Apple Music and Amazon Music had moved first.
The damage shows up late, and somewhere else
A price rise looks like success in revenue while customers quietly buy less. Mondelez's chocolate sales rose 8% on higher prices in the third quarter of 2025, while chocolate volume and mix slid 11%.
The ways companies did it
The decisions on record take four shapes. Each moves a different part of the price.
Charge more for what customers already buy
Raise the number, and give customers a reason to accept it.
- Uniqlo (Fast Retailing)
- Raised the price of its fleece zip jacket from ¥1,990 to ¥2,990 in 2022 as costs and a weak yen bit. In fiscal 2024 Fast Retailing's gross margin was 53.9% and operating profit rose 31.4%.
- Chick-fil-A
- Raised menu prices about 55% from 2014 to 2024, while McDonald's raised about 100% over the same decade. Systemwide sales climbed to $23.9 billion in 2025.
Charge less, on purpose
Lower the price to win volume, defend a position, or get ahead of pressure.
- Eli Lilly
- Cut the list price of its Humalog insulin from $274.70 a vial to $66.40 in March 2023, a 70% reduction. Lilly's U.S. revenue still rose 39% in the fourth quarter of 2023, driven by its newer drugs.
- Tesla
- Cut U.S. prices six times in early 2023 to drive volume. It delivered 1,808,581 vehicles that year, beating its target, while its automotive gross margin fell from 32.9% in Q1 2022 to 18.7% in Q3 2023.
- IKEA
- Cut prices by roughly 10% on average in fiscal 2024 and accepted a 5.3% fall in retail sales, from EUR 47.6 billion to EUR 45.1 billion, to honor its low-price rule.
Change what the price is charged for
Keep selling the same thing, but bill for it differently: by subscription, by employee, by household.
- Adobe
- Stopped selling boxed software in May 2013 and went subscription-only. Adobe's revenue dipped from $4.40 billion to $4.06 billion that year. By fiscal 2024 Adobe's Digital Media recurring revenue was $17.33 billion. In March 2026 it settled an FTC case over its cancellation terms for $150 million.
- Oracle
- In 2023 began charging for Java per employee, counting everyone whether or not they used it. Gartner estimated costs would rise two to five times for most organizations, and a 2025 survey found nearly eight in ten moving off Oracle's Java.
- Netflix
- Started charging for shared passwords, with pilots in Latin America in 2022 before widening it to more than 100 countries through 2023. In the quarter the change widened, the second of 2023, it added 5.89 million paid subscribers against an analyst consensus of about 1.77 million.
Decide who can buy before deciding what they pay
Limit access instead of raising the price to whatever the market would bear.
- Hermès
- Abolished the Birkin waiting list in April 2010 and let sales associates decide who is offered a bag. In 2024 group revenue reached €15.17 billion at a 40.5% recurring operating margin.
- Ferrari
- Grew shipments just 0.7% in 2024 while net revenue rose 11.8%, to €6,677 million. Its chief executive's phrase: "Quality of revenues over volumes."
What 54 companies did
Here is every decision on record, placed by the year it was made and marked by how it turned out. Hover a mark, or open the table, for the company and the outcome.
54 changing how you price decisions, 1899 to 2025
Each mark is one decision. "Never undone" means the company did not reverse it, not that it worked.
Show as a table
| Company | Year | Choice | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola | 1899 | Sell bottling rights | Never undone |
| American Express | 1991 | Build more places to charge | Never undone |
| McDonald's | 2002 | Launch national Dollar Menu | Walked back |
| Spotify | 2006 | Free freemium tier | Never undone |
| Apple | 2007 | Cut the price | Never undone |
| Hermes | 2010 | Allocation by discretion | Never undone |
| Adobe | 2013 | Move to subscription only | Never undone |
| Adobe | 2013 | Go subscription-only | Never undone |
| Best Buy | 2013 | Make price-matching permanent | Never undone |
| Microsoft Kinect | 2013 | Bundle Kinect mandatory | Walked back |
| T-Mobile | 2013 | Kill switching costs | Kept in part |
| Amazon | 2014 | Grow bundle then hike | Never undone |
| Uber | 2014 | Cap surge in emergencies | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2015 | Run referral acquisition machine | Kept in part |
| Tesla | 2016 | Name it Full Self-Driving | Kept in part |
| Cloudflare | 2017 | Give away DDoS mitigation | Too early to call |
| Disney | 2019 | Cheap land-grab launch price | Never undone |
| Novartis | 2019 | Price against alternative | Never undone |
| NIO | 2020 | Rent battery via BaaS | Never undone |
| BASF | 2022 | Restructure cost basis | Never undone |
| Broadcom | 2022 | Buy and reprice base | Never undone |
| Chick-fil-A | 2022 | Below-competitor inflation | Never undone |
| Nestle | 2022 | Pass costs through | Walked back |
| Netflix | 2022 | Charge for paid sharing | Never undone |
| Netflix | 2022 | Add degraded ad tier | Never undone |
| Netflix vs Disney+ | 2022 | Redesign the tollbooth | Never undone |
| Stellantis | 2022 | Extract a 20%+ premium | Walked back |
| Uniqlo (Fast Retailing) | 2022 | Raise prices, pass through costs | Never undone |
| X (Twitter) | 2022 | Sell verification checkmark | Never undone |
| Apple Vision Pro | 2023 | Price as developer filter | Walked back |
| Broadcom | 2023 | Kill perpetual licenses | Never undone |
| Eli Lilly | 2023 | Cut insulin list price 70% | Never undone |
| Kering (Gucci) | 2023 | Premiumize by subtraction | Kept in part |
| Lyft | 2023 | Suppress surge via supply | Never undone |
| Meta | 2023 | Declare permanent efficiency phase | Walked back |
| NIO | 2023 | Cut prices | Never undone |
| Oracle | 2023 | Per-employee subscription | Never undone |
| 2023 | Charge for API access | Never undone | |
| Spotify | 2023 | Raise the US price | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2023 | Cut prices for volume | Never undone |
| Verizon | 2023 | Unbundle into perks menu | Never undone |
| BYD | 2024 | Cut price via lower cost | Kept in part |
| Costco | 2024 | Rare, small, telegraphed hike | Never undone |
| Ferrari | 2024 | Grow volume, ration access | Never undone |
| H&M | 2024 | Hold the middle | Never undone |
| HubSpot | 2024 | Adopt per-seat pricing | Too early to call |
| IKEA | 2024 | Cut prices, accept lower revenue | Never undone |
| Microsoft | 2024 | Remove the 300-seat floor | Too early to call |
| TSMC | 2024 | Wall off as premium node | Kept in part |
| Eli Lilly | 2025 | Build a low cash channel | Never undone |
| Mondelez | 2025 | Pass cost through as price | Never undone |
| Salesforce | 2025 | Add meter, keep all | Never undone |
| Southwest | 2025 | Monetize the extras | Never undone |
| UPS | 2025 | Prioritize yield | Kept in part |
Of the 51 decisions that can be judged, 38 were never undone, 6 were walked back and 7 were kept only in part.
A price, once moved, tends to stay moved. Tesla's 2023 cuts were never undone, and neither was the fall in its margin that came with them. "Never undone" means the company kept the price, not that the price did what it was meant to.
The walk-backs
Put the pricing decisions that were walked back side by side and a pattern shows. Each price was set by what the company needed: a margin target, a platform plan, a public promise. None of them started from what customers would pay.
| Company | What it did | How it was undone | Kind of move |
|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald's2002 | Put a $1 Dollar Menu on national television, which pulled franchisees' higher prices down | The Double Cheeseburger left the Dollar Menu in 2008, and in 2013 it became 'Dollar Menu & More' | Promised a price costs could not hold |
| Microsoft2013 | Required every Xbox One to ship with Kinect, at $499, $100 more than the PS4, so that developers would build for a Kinect in every home | By March 2014 Microsoft surrendered the bundle and launched a Kinect-less Xbox One at PS4 parity | Priced to a platform plan |
| Nestle2022 | Passed rising costs straight through to shoppers to protect its margin | The chief executive was replaced in September 2024; under his successor, price rises fell back and marketing was restoredVolume and mix turned negative at -0.3% in 2023 | Priced to the margin target |
| Stellantis2022 | Pushed Jeep and Ram prices more than 20% above the market | By the end of 2024 the premium narrowed toward the market average, and the chief executive resigned on December 1, 2024U.S. share fell from 10.2% to 8.4%, and 2024 net profit fell 70% | Priced to the margin target |
The kind of move is Stratrix's reading of each case. Meta's 2023 "Year of Efficiency" is also recorded here as walked back, but it is a decision about headcount, not price, so it is left out. So is Apple's Vision Pro, priced in 2023 to filter for developers: what Apple later stopped was the product, not the price. The decisions kept only in part, such as Gucci's move up-market and UPS's shift from volume to yield, are left out: in each the move itself stood, but Gucci's creative director was gone within two years and UPS's cut to Amazon volume was still under way.
The price rises that held did something different first. Amazon made Prime richer before it charged more. Spotify waited until Apple and Amazon had raised their prices, so it was catching up rather than leading. Chick-fil-A raised prices every year but stayed below the chain its customers compare it with.
Costco shows the same discipline with a fee. It waited seven years, then raised the Gold Star membership by just $5 and said so well in advance. Membership fee revenue rose 10% to $5.32 billion in fiscal 2025, and the U.S. and Canada renewal rate slipped only from 93.0% to 92.3%.
Customers do not judge a price. They judge a price against something.
What the share price did
For many of the decisions there is a clean market record: the company's total return over the three years after the decision, against the S&P 500.
Three years after the decision, against the S&P 500
Percentage points of total return above or below the index, for the 19 decisions with a clean market record. 63% beat it; the median was +70.9 points.
Show as a table
| Company | Year | vs S&P 500, 3 years | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom | 2022 | +342.8 | Never undone |
| Meta | 2023 | +279.6 | Walked back |
| Netflix | 2022 | +217.7 | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2023 | +161.7 | Never undone |
| Eli Lilly | 2023 | +144.1 | Never undone |
| Spotify | 2023 | +127.7 | Never undone |
| Apple | 2007 | +102.3 | Never undone |
| Amazon | 2014 | +98.8 | Never undone |
| Adobe | 2013 | +71.7 | Never undone |
| Best Buy | 2013 | +70.9 | Never undone |
| Adobe | 2013 | +62.7 | Never undone |
| Oracle | 2023 | +57.3 | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2015 | −12.1 | Kept in part |
| Verizon | 2023 | −22.9 | Never undone |
| Novartis | 2019 | −27.2 | Never undone |
| Tesla | 2016 | −28.1 | Kept in part |
| Disney | 2019 | −41.9 | Never undone |
| NIO | 2020 | −59.2 | Never undone |
| NIO | 2023 | −116.6 | Never undone |
The chart does not sort by whether the price was right. Tesla's 2023 price cuts held and took its automotive gross margin from 32.9% to 18.7%, and its shares beat the index by 161.7 points over the next three years. NIO's cuts the same year trailed it by 116.6. Eli Lilly cut insulin by 70% and beat the index by 144.1 points, carried by its newer drugs.
A pricing decision is a small part of what moves a share price. Judge it by what happened to volume, margin and the customers you kept.
How to run this decision
If you are weighing a version of this choice, here is what the record suggests doing, in order.
- Decide whether you are changing the number or the unit
Ten percent more per seat is a number. Per user to per employee, or a one-time sale to a subscription, is a change of unit. Customers re-judge the whole relationship when the unit changes, so plan it like a product launch, not a price update.
Seen in: Adobe, 2013 · Oracle, 2023 - Give customers something new to compare the price with
Before a rise, make the product better or the bundle bigger, so that the new price lands on a better offer. Amazon added video to Prime three years before it raised the fee, and members compared the new price with the richer service.
Seen in: Amazon, 2014 - Know which price your customers compare you with, and stay on the right side of it
It is usually a rival, sometimes your own old price. Spotify moved after Apple and Amazon did. Chick-fil-A raised prices every year and still looked restrained next to McDonald's. Find your reference before you move.
Seen in: Spotify, 2023 · Chick-fil-A, 2022 - Watch volume, not just revenue
A price rise always looks good in the revenue line first. Track how many units customers buy, and how many customers stay, every month after the change. That is where the cost of a wrong price shows up, often a year later.
Seen in: Nestle, 2022 · Mondelez, 2025 - Never promise a price you do not control
A price tied to a coin, a slogan or a public pledge becomes hard to move when costs or rivals move. McDonald's spent years retreating from the dollar. Promise value, not a number.
Seen in: McDonald's, 2002 - Test where a mistake is cheapest
Try the change in a few small markets first, and write down what result would make you stop. Netflix piloted paid sharing in Latin America in 2022 and widened it market by market through 2023, so the markets that carried most of its revenue came last.
Seen in: Netflix, 2022
To work the numbers for your own case, read Price increase strategy: how much volume can a rise afford to lose?.
Warning signs
What it has looked like when this decision was going wrong.
- Revenue is up on price while the units sold are falling.Mondelez, 2025 · Nestle, 2022
- The price is set by what the margin target needs.Stellantis, 2022
- Someone has publicly promised a price.McDonald's, 2002
- The plan describes customers as captive.Broadcom, 2023
All 54 cases
Each case is one company at one decision: what was on the table, what it chose, why, and what followed, with every fact sourced.
Never undone · 38
- Coca-Cola, 1899Sell bottling rights
- American Express, 1991Build more places to charge
- Spotify, 2006Free freemium tier
- Apple, 2007Cut the price
- Hermes, 2010Allocation by discretion
- Adobe, 2013Move to subscription only
- Adobe, 2013Go subscription-only
- Best Buy, 2013Make price-matching permanent
- Amazon, 2014Grow bundle then hike
- Uber, 2014Cap surge in emergencies
- Disney, 2019Cheap land-grab launch price
- Novartis, 2019Price against alternative
- NIO, 2020Rent battery via BaaS
- BASF, 2022Restructure cost basis
- Broadcom, 2022Buy and reprice base
- Chick-fil-A, 2022Below-competitor inflation
- Netflix, 2022Charge for paid sharing
- Netflix, 2022Add degraded ad tier
- Netflix vs Disney+, 2022Redesign the tollbooth
- Uniqlo (Fast Retailing), 2022Raise prices, pass through costs
- X (Twitter), 2022Sell verification checkmark
- Broadcom, 2023Kill perpetual licenses
- Eli Lilly, 2023Cut insulin list price 70%
- Lyft, 2023Suppress surge via supply
- NIO, 2023Cut prices
- Oracle, 2023Per-employee subscription
- Reddit, 2023Charge for API access
- Spotify, 2023Raise the US price
- Tesla, 2023Cut prices for volume
- Verizon, 2023Unbundle into perks menu
- Costco, 2024Rare, small, telegraphed hike
- Ferrari, 2024Grow volume, ration access
- H&M, 2024Hold the middle
- IKEA, 2024Cut prices, accept lower revenue
- Eli Lilly, 2025Build a low cash channel
- Mondelez, 2025Pass cost through as price
- Salesforce, 2025Add meter, keep all
- Southwest, 2025Monetize the extras
Kept in part · 7
- T-Mobile, 2013Kill switching costs
- Tesla, 2015Run referral acquisition machine
- Tesla, 2016Name it Full Self-Driving
- Kering (Gucci), 2023Premiumize by subtraction
- BYD, 2024Cut price via lower cost
- TSMC, 2024Wall off as premium node
- UPS, 2025Prioritize yield
Walked back · 6
- McDonald's, 2002Launch national Dollar Menu
- Microsoft Kinect, 2013Bundle Kinect mandatory
- Nestle, 2022Pass costs through
- Stellantis, 2022Extract a 20%+ premium
- Apple Vision Pro, 2023Price as developer filter
- Meta, 2023Declare permanent efficiency phase
Too early to call · 3
- Cloudflare, 2017Give away DDoS mitigation
- HubSpot, 2024Adopt per-seat pricing
- Microsoft, 2024Remove the 300-seat floor
Questions
- What is a pricing strategy?
- A company's choice of what to charge, for what unit, and how that changes over time. It includes raising and cutting prices, changing what the price is charged for (such as moving to subscriptions), and rationing access instead of raising the price.
- How do you raise prices without losing customers?
- On record, the rises that held gave customers a better comparison: a richer product first, as with Amazon Prime, or a price still below the rival customers compare with, as with Chick-fil-A. Watch volume closely afterwards, not just revenue.
- What are examples of pricing strategy changes?
- Amazon raising the Prime fee after adding video, Adobe moving to subscriptions only, Netflix charging for shared passwords, Eli Lilly cutting insulin list prices by 70%, and Hermès allocating Birkin bags instead of selling them to whoever pays.
- Why do price changes fail?
- The ones on record that were walked back were set by what the company needed rather than what customers would pay: a margin target, a platform plan, or a public promise about price that rising costs made impossible to keep.
More from Stratrix
“What does changing how you charge cost before it starts paying?”
See the pack — $499 →All Access
Every Casebook, three Strategy Packs a seat each year and the Analyst, for teams that face these decisions all year.
$1,999 a year · $499 a seatWhat is included →Test a decision, free
Set a live decision against the companies that made it before you.
AcquisitionsThe Distance TestDivestituresThe Divestiture TestDiversificationThe Diversification TestMake or buyThe Make-or-Buy TestNew analyses, by email
The defining moves in business, checked against the record, as they publish.