Instagram Didn't Kill Snapchat. It Did Something Quieter, and Worse.
Instagram copied Snapchat's Stories format to the pixel and launched in August 2016. Snap's own filings show its users never fell - they kept rising past 178M. What Instagram stole wasn't the users. It was the slope.
Comes with a free Cannibalization Decision Tree template — plus a worked example for Snap.
In October 2013, Snapchat shipped a small, strange feature: a photo you posted would disappear in twenty-four hours, and anyone could watch it. They called it 'My Story.' Within eight months it had eaten the app - by June 2014 Stories had passed private snaps as the most-used thing on the platform, with more than a billion story views a day.8 Snapchat had invented the format every social network now runs. It had a three-year head start. And it still lost the war over it.
The story everyone tells is that Instagram copied Stories, and Instagram killed Snapchat. The first half is true to the pixel. The second half is wrong - and the way it's wrong is the whole lesson. Snapchat never shrank. Its users kept climbing for years after Instagram fired its copy. What Instagram took was something that doesn't show up as a falling number, which is exactly why it was so hard to defend.
The users never left. The slope did.
Read Snap's own filings and the popular obituary falls apart. Through 2016, Snapchat had been a rocket: it added more than 15 million new daily users every quarter.6 Then Instagram Stories launched on August 2, 2016.5 In the very next reporting period - Q4 2016 - Snapchat added just 5 million new daily users, and described its own growth as 'relatively flat in the early part of the quarter.'6 But here's the part the 'Instagram killed Snapchat' narrative skips: the user count itself never dropped. It went 158 million in Q4 2016, to 166 million, to 173 million, to 178 million across 2017.1234 Snapchat was still growing the entire time it was supposedly dying.
| Quarter | Daily active users | Sequential growth |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2016 | 158M | added ~5M, after quarters of 15M+ |
| Q1 2017 | 166M | +5% QoQ |
| Q2 2017 | 173M | +4% QoQ |
| Q3 2017 | 178M | +3% QoQ |
Notice the shape. Absolute users up, every single quarter. Growth rate down, every single quarter - 5%, then 4%, then 3%, the year-over-year figure deteriorating alongside it.234 That is not a company being killed. It is a company whose acceleration was switched off. And acceleration was the only thing Snapchat had to sell.
Instagram didn't need a better idea. It had 300 million people.
Here is the mechanism, and it has nothing to do with who was more creative. When Instagram launched Stories, it didn't have to convince anyone to download an app or learn a behavior. It had 300 million people opening Instagram every single day already.5 It dropped a copied format on top of an audience that was, in distribution terms, already assembled. Systrom didn't even pretend otherwise - he said outright that Snapchat 'deserve all the credit' for the format.5 The honesty was a flex. He could afford to give Snapchat the credit because he was taking the distribution.
“They deserve all the credit.”5
Watch how fast the gap closed once an existing audience was pointed at the format. Instagram Stories hit 100 million daily users within two months, 150 million by January 2017, 200 million by April, 250 million by June - ten months from a standing start to a quarter-billion daily users.7 Snapchat had spent four years getting to 178 million.4 The format was identical. The math was not even close. When the same idea sits on top of a network that's already there, the one that distributes faster wins, and originality counts for nothing.
Wasn't it really Snapchat's own bugs?
The fair objection is that this pins everything on Instagram when Snapchat tripped over its own feet. That's partly right, and Snap admitted it. The S-1 blamed the Q4 2016 stall on two things, not one: 'increased competition' and self-inflicted 'performance issues' from mid-2016 product updates that, in the filing's own words, hurt growth particularly among Android users.1 So the Instagram effect was real but compounded - a clone arriving at the exact moment Snapchat's own app was wobbling on cheaper phones in the markets where its next billion users lived. But the steelman cuts both ways. Bugs get fixed; Snapchat's didn't reverse the trend. The deceleration didn't bounce when the performance issues were patched - it kept going, 5% to 4% to 3%.234 A temporary bug doesn't produce a permanently flatter curve. A competitor with 300 million pre-loaded users does.
Snapchat invented the most-copied format in social media and still lost the fight over it, because the thing it built was copyable in an afternoon and the thing Instagram had - 300 million daily users to point at the copy - was not. If your edge is a clever feature sitting on a network you are still building, a larger network can clone the feature and out-distribute you before you finish defending it. The lesson isn't 'don't innovate.' It's that the second-mover wins when it owns the audience: the asset to protect is the distribution, not the idea. And watch the right metric while you do it - a rival can leave your user count rising and still win by quietly stealing your growth rate, which is the number that prices your future.
When Snap filed to go public in February 2017, it reported 158 million daily users and 48% year-over-year growth.1 On paper, a winner. But the market doesn't price what you have - it prices the slope, and the slope had just been bent by a copy of Snapchat's own best idea. Instagram never had to take a single user away. It only had to take the trajectory, and the trajectory was the whole story the IPO was selling. Snapchat built the format the entire internet now runs on. It just didn't own the one thing that decided who got to keep it.
Cannibalization Decision Tree
A decision tree for the moment the new thing threatens the cash cow: is the disruption real, will someone else do it if you don't, and can you afford to bleed your own margin to own the future? Blank to run on your own line; filled as the worked example tracing how the story's incumbent chose to cannibalize — or flinched and got cannibalized.
The worked example unlocks with a subscription. See plans →
Sources
Where this comes from — the filings, records, and reporting behind it.
- 1Snap Inc. S-1 filed February 2, 2017 reported 158 million average DAUs for Q4 2016, up 48% year-over-year from 103 million in Q4 2015; growth slowed sharply in H2 2016 in Europe and rest-of-world; the company cited 'increased competition' and self-inflicted 'performance issues' on Android as dual causes.
- 2Snap Q1 2017 8-K: DAUs grew from 122M in Q1 2016 to 166M in Q1 2017 (+36% YoY), but only +5% quarter-over-quarter from Q4 2016's 158M—confirming continued absolute growth but a sharply decelerated sequential rate post-Instagram Stories launch.
- 3Snap Q2 2017 8-K: DAUs were 173M vs. 143M in Q2 2016 (+21% YoY), growing only 4% QoQ from Q1 2017's 166M—sequential growth was decelerating each quarter post-Stories launch.
- 4Snap Q3 2017 8-K: DAUs were 178M vs. 153M in Q3 2016 (+17% YoY), only +3% QoQ from Q2 2017's 173M—year-over-year growth rate itself deteriorating each quarter through 2017.
- 5Instagram Stories launched August 2, 2016; CEO Kevin Systrom publicly conceded 'They [Snapchat] deserve all the credit' for the format while arguing the feature was about taking a format to a different network. Instagram had 500M monthly active users and 300M daily actives at launch, giving Stories a built-in distribution Snapchat could not match.
- 6After averaging more than 15 million new daily active users per quarter through Q1-Q3 2016, Snapchat added just 5 million new DAUs in Q4 2016—the quarter Instagram Stories launched and scaled. Snap's own S-1 described growth as 'relatively flat in the early part of the quarter' and cited 'increased competition' as a cause.
- 7Instagram Stories reached 100 million daily active users within two months of launch (by October 2016), then 150M in January 2017, 200M in April 2017 (surpassing Snapchat's total DAU growth rate), and 250M in June 2017—all within 10 months of launch.
- 8Snapchat originated the 24-hour ephemeral Stories format in October 2013 ('My Story' feature), nearly three years before Instagram's copy. By June 2014, Stories had already surpassed person-to-person private snaps as Snapchat's most-used feature, with over 1 billion story views per day.