Pairs with the Disruption Vulnerability Assessment — a ready-to-use strategy tool. Get it — included with a subscription, or $1.99 →
For a few hours on August 20, 2011, the most wanted tablet in America was the one its own maker had just killed. HP had cut the TouchPad to $99 the day before8, and shoppers who had ignored it for weeks now mobbed store counters and crashed checkout pages to grab a device with no future. The same machine that couldn't move at $499 sold out almost instantly at $99. That gap — between a tablet nobody wanted and a tablet everybody fought over — is the whole story. The TouchPad never had a demand problem. It had a price it was never worth, attached to a clock that had already run out.
The official story is that the TouchPad was a bad product that flopped, lasted only 49 days, and got pulled. Almost every part of the framing misleads. The hardware wasn't the fatal flaw. The 49 days weren't where the failure happened. The failure was a series of strategic decisions made before a single unit shipped — and the most expensive of them was deciding what the thing should cost.
A $1.2 billion bet, priced like a coin flip
HP didn't wander into the tablet market. It bought its way in deliberately, paying roughly $1.2 billion to acquire Palm and its webOS platform, a deal that closed on July 1, 2010.1 That is the tell: HP treated this as a platform play, not a gadget. You don't spend over a billion dollars on an operating system unless you mean to build an ecosystem around it. And then, having made the expensive bet, HP made the cheap mistake. It launched the TouchPad on July 1, 2011 at $499 for 16 GB and $599 for 32 GB — exactly the iPad's price.4
Price is a promise about value. Charge what the leader charges, and you are telling the buyer your product is the leader's equal. HP's own chief technology officer knew it wasn't. He later conceded the TouchPad 'was half a generation or a generation behind the iPad and so that wasn't going to drive volume.'7 Read those two facts together and the absurdity is plain: HP shipped a device it privately understood to be a step behind, and asked customers to pay full leader money for it. A challenger's only weapon is a reason to switch. Parity pricing on inferior hardware hands that weapon back.
“It was half a generation or a generation behind the iPad and so that wasn't going to drive volume.”7
Five months to bleed out before launch
Timing compounded the price error. HP announced the TouchPad on February 9, 2011 at its 'Think Beyond' event, then didn't put it on sale until July 1 — a runway of nearly five months.54 In a stable category that's a normal cadence. In a platform race against a faster rival, it's a slow bleed. Every week of that gap was a week Apple's ecosystem got deeper, app developers got busier elsewhere, and the press moved on. By the time the TouchPad arrived, the conversation it was supposed to start had already been had without it. The result showed up where it always does first — at the loading dock. Of roughly 270,000 units HP pushed into Best Buy's channel, only about 25,000 sold, missing HP's internal milestones by a wide margin.5 Inventory was sitting in the back room of the country's biggest electronics retailer, and the front of the store didn't care.
How a billion-dollar platform died as a line in an earnings call
Here is the part that turns a product failure into a strategic indictment. HP didn't kill the TouchPad with a plan. It killed it with a footnote. On August 18, 2011, buried in its Q3 earnings release, HP said it 'plans to announce that it will discontinue operations for webOS devices, specifically the TouchPad and webOS phones,' while it would 'continue to explore options to optimize the value of webOS software going forward.'3 CEO Leo Apotheker framed it on the call as a tidy operational call: 'Our TouchPad has not been gaining enough traction in the marketplace. We have made the difficult but necessary decision to shut down the WebOS hardware operations.'6 A $1.2 billion ecosystem bet was retired with the same tone you'd use to close an underperforming sales region.
| The popular story | What the record shows | |
|---|---|---|
| The cause of death | A bad product nobody liked | A device priced at iPad parity that HP knew was a half-generation behind |
| The fatal moment | The 49-day commercial life | The pricing and timing decisions made before launch |
| The exit | A clean discontinuation | A line inside a Q3 earnings release, not a coherent platform strategy |
| The proof of demand | There was none | A $99 firesale that sold out within hours |
Then came the firesale, and the firesale is the verdict. The day after discontinuation, HP slashed the price to $99 for 16 GB and $149 for 32 GB.8 Most brick-and-mortar retailers sold out within hours.8 By December, an estimated 903,354 TouchPads had moved — enough to make HP the top non-Apple tablet seller in the US for 2011.8 Sit with that. The 'failed' tablet became the year's best-selling non-Apple tablet the instant it was priced honestly. The market hadn't rejected the device. It had rejected the price. HP discovered the true value of its own product only after it had decided the product had no value at all.
Wasn't the hardware just not good enough?
The honest counter is that the TouchPad genuinely was behind — HP's own CTO said so7 — and a tablet that trails the leader may simply deserve to fail. That's the fair objection, and it's half right. The hardware was not a winner. But 'behind on specs' and 'unsellable' are different claims, and the firesale demolishes the second one. Nearly a million units found buyers once the price reflected reality.8 A truly bad product doesn't clear stockrooms in an afternoon at any price; it sits. What the $99 sale proved is that the gap between the TouchPad and the iPad was real but small enough to be priced around — and HP's strategic error was refusing to price around it. It launched a number-two product on number-one's terms, gave it five months to lose relevance, and then abandoned it before learning what number-two pricing could have done. The specs were the excuse. The strategy was the cause.
When you're the challenger, your price tells the buyer where you rank. Charge parity with the leader and you've claimed a tie you can't back up; the customer has no reason to defect. The TouchPad's hardware was a half-step behind, which is survivable — its $499 price tag and five-month pre-launch runway were not. A platform bet dies the moment the market believes its window has closed, and a slow rollout against a faster ecosystem closes that window for you. If you must enter behind, enter cheap, enter fast, and commit to the ecosystem long enough to compound. Half-pricing a product after you've already declared it dead isn't a strategy. It's a confession.
HP spent $1.2 billion to buy a future in tablets, then made three decisions that guaranteed it wouldn't arrive: it priced a follower like a leader, it gave the launch a runway long enough to go stale, and it executed the exit as an aside on an earnings call.143 The 49 days everyone remembers were never where the TouchPad died. It was already gone the moment HP put a $499 sticker on a device it knew was a step behind. The firesale wasn't the failure's punchline — it was its rebuttal, a billion-dollar lesson that in platform markets, the spec sheet is rarely what kills you. The price tag and the calendar do.
When the strategy, not the product, was the flaw
Disruption Vulnerability Assessment
An assessment that rates a company across the dimensions that predict disruption: how cheaply a challenger can serve the unsexy bottom of the market, how trapped you are by margins and a satisfied core. Blank to score your own position before the cliff; filled as the worked example showing where the story's incumbent was already exposed while the numbers still looked great.
Included with any subscription, or unlock this tool for $1.99. Get it → · See plans →
Sources
Where this comes from — the filings, records, and reporting behind it.
- 1HP completed its acquisition of Palm Inc. at a price of $5.70 per share, representing an enterprise value of approximately $1.2 billion, on July 1, 2010.
- 2HP to Acquire Palm for $1.2 billion at $5.70 per share — the original announcement of the definitive agreement, approved by both boards, dated April 28, 2010.
- 3HP announced on August 18, 2011, via its Q3 earnings release, that it 'plans to announce that it will discontinue operations for webOS devices, specifically the TouchPad and webOS phones,' and would 'continue to explore options to optimize the value of webOS software going forward.'
- 4The HP TouchPad was launched on July 1, 2011 in the US at $499 (16 GB) and $599 (32 GB), the same price as the iPad; on August 18, 2011—49 days later—HP announced discontinuation of all webOS devices.
- 5The HP TouchPad was announced February 9, 2011 at the 'Think Beyond' event; initial Best Buy channel sales were approximately 25,000 of 270,000 units stocked, failing to meet HP's internal milestones and financial targets.
- 6HP CEO Leo Apotheker said on the August 18 conference call: 'Our TouchPad has not been gaining enough traction in the marketplace. We have made the difficult but necessary decision to shut down the WebOS hardware operations.'
- 7HP CTO Shane Robison stated the TouchPad 'was half a generation or a generation behind the iPad and so that wasn't going to drive volume.'
- 8The firesale price drop (to $99 for 16 GB, $149 for 32 GB) was announced August 19; most brick-and-mortar retailers sold out within hours on August 20; ~350,000 units were reportedly sold in roughly 24 hours (per TNW, MIT Technology Review citing reports — figure unconfirmed by HP); by December 2011, an estimated 903,354 total TouchPads had been sold, making HP the top non-Apple tablet seller in the US for 2011.