Crisis & Reinvention

The Turnaround

How did they come back from near-death?

91%
of the 43 settled decisions on record held
39 held0 reversed4 held in part1 too early to call

Held over settled: 43 records whose verdict is in, from forks between 1984–2026, with 1 still too early to call and counted in neither. This is what happened to the companies on record, not the odds for your decision. The corpus covers decisions documented well enough to verify, which skews toward companies that lasted long enough to be written about.

Morgan Stanley, Ford, Best Buy, Dell, Abercrombie & Fitch, Adidas, Disney, IBM and 23 more faced this decision. Below is what was on the table, what each chose, and what it returned.

The record

  1. 2009

    Morgan Stanley

    Held

    Whether to shift Morgan Stanley's earnings from volatile trading toward durable, fee-based wealth management

    • Pivot to fee-based wealthTrade volatile trading revenue for durable, fee-based revenue via the Smith Barney JVchose this
    • Stay a trading houseKeep identity centered on capital-at-risk, balance-sheet-heavy trading revenue

    Stated reasonTo rebalance the firm's portfolio so a greater percentage of revenues and income come from balance sheet light and more durable sources

    What happened
    • 2020-02 Wealth/IM share of pre-tax profits: expected ~57% of pre-tax profits post-integration, up from ~26% in 2010
    • 2024 Fee-based client assets: reached $2.347 trillion at year-end 2024, up from $1.983 trillion a year before
    • 2025 Firm ROTCE: 18.8% for 2024, running above 20% for the first half of 2025
    Read the full analysis →
  2. 2006

    Ford

    Held

    Whether to mortgage Ford's assets to raise a war chest instead of relying on a later federal bailout

    • Borrow against all assetsPledge factories, IP and logo for a $23.5 billion facility.chose this
    • Wait for federal bailoutFollow rivals into bankruptcy and take government support.

    Stated reasonThe credit line bought the time to ride out 2008 and 2009 without a federal bailout while rivals could not

    What happened
    • 2008 Full-year net result: Full-year 2008 net loss of $14.6 billion, a record at the time
    • 2009 Full-year net income: Full-year 2009 net income of $2.7 billion, first annual profit in four years, on revenue of $118.3 billion
    • 2009 Quarterly special item: Q2 2009 pre-tax operating loss of $424 million yet net income of $2.3 billion, driven by a $3.4 billion gain on debt reduction
    Read the full analysis →
  3. 2012

    Best Buy

    Held

    How to survive Amazon: fight on price or monetize the showroom floor

    • Fight Amazon on priceCompete directly on lowest online prices
    • Sell the floor to vendorsCharge suppliers for branded stores-within-a-storechose this

    Stated reasonBest Buy could not win a price war with Amazon, so it turned physical display into space vendors would pay for

    What happened
    • 2014 annualized cost reductions: beat $725M target, reporting $765M after one fiscal year
    • 2014 domestic online sales: rose 20% in fiscal 2014
    • 2014 total revenue: troughed near $39.8 billion in fiscal 2013 and recovered toward $42.4 billion in fiscal 2014
    Read the full analysis →
  4. 2015

    Dell

    Held

    How should Dell structure and finance its acquisition of EMC?

    • All-cash purchaseWrite a full check to buy EMC outright.
    • Cash plus VMware tracking stockPay cash per share and pin the rest to VMware's stock, absorbing debt behind a private-company shield.chose this

    Stated reasonDell could not write a $67 billion check, so as a private company it structured the deal to swallow the leverage and pay it down off-stage using VMware.

    What happened
    • 2018-07 gross debt paid down: Dell had paid down $13 billion of gross debt since the EMC merger
    • 2018-12 return to public markets: Shareholders approved the exchange with more than 61% in favor and Dell relisted on the NYSE as DELL without an IPO
    • 2021-04-14 VMware special dividend and spin-off: VMware first paid a special cash dividend of $11.5 to $12.0 billion to all stockholders, then was spun off entirely
    Read the full analysis →
  5. 2022

    Abercrombie & Fitch

    Held

    Rebuild through buying discipline and set a formal turnaround plan rather than chase brand heat

    • Institutional buying-discipline rebuildFix inventory and margin discipline first, brand heat lastchose this
    • Chase brand reignitionPrioritize marketing and viral brand-heat revival

    Stated reasonThe problem was a company that had stopped reading its own customers, so it rebuilt inventory and buying discipline before touching marketing

    What happened
    • 2023 gross profit rate: Fiscal 2023 full-year gross profit rate of 62.9%, up approximately 600 basis points vs. prior year
    • 2023 revenue vs plan: Hit the top of the 2025 range - $4.3 billion - in fiscal 2023, two years early
    • 2024 net sales and operating margin: Fiscal 2024 net sales of $4.95 billion, up 16%, at a 15.0% operating margin
    Read the full analysis →
  6. 2022

    Adidas

    Held

    Whether to write off the stranded Yeezy inventory or sell it down

    • Write off Yeezy inventoryTake the loss and dispose of stranded stock
    • Sell down Yeezy inventoryLiquidate remaining stock through managed dropschose this

    Stated reasonSelling the stranded stock turned a near-write-off into a profit stream

    What happened
    • 2024 net income: flipped from a €58M net loss to €824M net income from continuing operations
    • 2024 Yeezy contribution to operating profit: Adidas attributes roughly €200M of the operating profit improvement to Yeezy liquidation
    • 2024 North America revenue: full-year revenues fell 1.6% in reported terms
    Read the full analysis →
  7. 2023

    Adidas

    Held

    Whether to write off the dead Yeezy inventory or sell it and donate proceeds

    • Write off Yeezy inventoryWalk away from the Yeezy stock entirely, taking write-offs
    • Sell stock, donate proceedsSell remaining Yeezy inventory and donate a portion to charitychose this

    Stated reasonSelling the stock turned a feared liability into a salvage operation generating profit

    Committedover €110M (Adidas pledged over €110M in donations from Yeezy sales)

    What happened
    • 2024 Operating profit: operating profit jumped 398% to €1,337 million
    • 2023 Yeezy inventory sales: roughly €750 million in net sales and about €300 million in operating profit
    • 2023 Operating profit: Full-year 2023 operating profit landed at a positive €268 million
    Read the full analysis →
  8. 1984

    Disney

    Held

    Whether to fight the raider or pay greenmail to end the takeover

    • Pay greenmail to raiderBuy back Steinberg's shares at a premium to end the takeover attemptchose this
    • Continue fighting takeoverResist the raider's bid for up to 49% of the company

    Stated reasonThe company was broke and cornered and paid a premium to make the raider go away

    Committedabout $300 million (plus another $28 million for Steinberg's out-of-pocket expenses)

    What happened
    • 1994 Filmed entertainment operating income: $448.2 million for nine months ending mid-1994, up 32% year over year
    • 1984 Roy E. Disney board resignation and Miller ouster: Roy E. Disney resigned from the board in 1984, beginning events leading to Ron Miller's ouster
    • 1984 Management change: A bloc of shareholders controlling roughly 36% installed Eisner and Wells
    Read the full analysis →
  9. 1993

    IBM

    Held

    Break IBM into autonomous units, or keep the company whole?

    • Break into Baby BluesSplit IBM into autonomous standalone units competing individually
    • Keep the company wholePreserve the integrated giant to deliver end-to-end solutionschose this

    Stated reasonThe one thing nobody else could offer was the integrated solution customers wanted from IBM.

    What happened
    • 1996 strategic pivot: IBM pivoted into services and coined 'e-business' in 1996
    • 2002 market value: rose from $29 billion in 1993 to $168 billion
    • 2002 layoffs: more than 100,000 employees were laid off
    Read the full analysis →
  10. 1999

    Hyundai

    Held

    Whether to post an industry-longest warranty as a credibility bond before the cars' quality was fully proven

    • Post the warranty bondOffer industry-longest warranty to buy trust before quality is provenchose this
    • Fix cars first, then advertiseImprove quality before making any public promise

    Stated reasonA costly public commitment made Hyundai's confidence expensive enough to be credible, buying time for skeptical buyers to take a chance while the cars got good

    What happened
    • 2004 J.D. Power quality ranking: Sonata posted the highest initial quality in the midsized-car category, the first time a Korean brand beat both European and US brands
    • 2011 J.D. Power IQS ranking: Ranked 32nd out of 37 in 2001, rising to 10th out of 37 by 2011
    • 2025 J.D. Power IQS corporate ranking: Hyundai Motor Group tied for the highest ranking among corporations for the second consecutive year; Hyundai brand placed third overall
    Read the full analysis →
  11. 1999

    Kering (Gucci)

    Held

    How Gucci should defend against LVMH's creeping stake — invite a friendlier giant in

    • Invite PPR as white knightSell roughly 40% of capital to PPR to block LVMHchose this
    • Let LVMH accumulateAllow LVMH's stake to grow toward control

    Stated reasonThe white-knight capital let Gucci go on the offensive against LVMH and build a multi-brand group

    Committedabout $2.9 billion (PPR paid this for roughly 40% of Gucci's capital in March 1999)

    What happened
    • 2001-09 LVMH litigation settled: PPR bought out 8.6 million of LVMH's shares at $94 each, resolving the fight
    • 2004 ownership: PPR reached 99.4% ownership in 2004, at $101.50 a share
    • 2026 Gucci revenue: Gucci revenues fell 14.3% to €1.35 billion
    Read the full analysis →
  12. 2002

    Levi's

    Held

    Whether to close U.S. plants and move production offshore to cut the cost base to match shrunken sales

    • Cut cost base offshoreClose U.S. plants and move production offshore to shrink costschose this
    • Chase growth via WalmartLaunch a cheaper mass-channel line to grow the top line

    Stated reasonTo take the cost base down to match its shrunken sales so a smaller business could survive

    Committedsome $200 million on employee benefits tied to the layoffs (spending associated with the plant closures)

    What happened
    • 2003 Total debt: total debt stood at $2.31 billion, with the rise attributed partly to higher inventories from the mass-channel entry
    • 2003-09 Credit rating: Fitch affirmed Levi Strauss at 'B' with a Negative outlook
    • 2004 Net sales: $4.15 billion in fiscal 2002, $4.09 billion in fiscal 2003, and $4.07 billion in fiscal 2004
    Read the full analysis →