Best Buy · Decision Forks

Best Buy Didn't Beat Amazon. It Made Amazon Pay the Rent.

In 2012 Best Buy was the showroom where 71% of browsers walked out and bought from Amazon. The turnaround everyone calls 'fighting Amazon' was the opposite: Joly stopped fighting price, used the threat as leverage, and turned the enemy's own suppliers into landlords.

Decision Forks · 8 min

Comes with a free Turnaround Diagnosis Worksheet template — plus a worked example for Best Buy.

In 2012, Best Buy ran the most expensive advertisement Amazon never had to pay for. A shopper walked into a bright store, picked up a TV, asked an employee in a blue shirt how it compared to the model next to it, weighed the answer, pulled out a phone, scanned the barcode, found the same set cheaper online, and walked out. Seventy-one percent of the people who did this at Best Buy bought from Amazon instead. Only eight percent came back to BestBuy.com.7 The store was doing the selling. Someone else was ringing up the sale.

The story everyone tells is that Best Buy fought Amazon and won — that it out-priced, out-clicked, and out-hustled the internet's biggest store. Almost none of that is what happened. Best Buy never beat Amazon on price, and it never tried to for long. What it did was stop pretending price was the fight, and start charging Amazon's own suppliers for the floor space their browsers were standing on.

The company was a showroom that forgot to charge admission

When Hubert Joly was named CEO in August 2012,1 the numbers told a brutal story underneath a calm surface. Revenue had flatlined for years — about $49.2 billion, $49.7 billion, then $50.7 billion across fiscal 2010, 2011, and 20123 — the kind of plateau that looks like stability until you notice the floor is rotting beneath it. The company lost roughly $1.2 billion in fiscal 2012, ran more than 1,400 stores, and had a website its own e-commerce president admitted was stuck 'in a 10-year time warp,' pulling in only about 6% of revenue at a time when a quarter of all consumer-electronics sales had already moved online.8 By the time the turnaround plan was unveiled that November, the stock had sunk below $15.2

The trap was structural, not strategic. Best Buy carried the full cost of a physical network — rent, staff, lighting, inventory — to do the one job Amazon needed done and couldn't do itself: let people see and touch the thing before they bought it. Electronics were the worst possible category for this. Of all shoppers who showroomed across every retailer, more named Best Buy as their favorite showroom than any other chain.7 It had become America's most popular place to decide what to buy from someone else.

71%
of people who showroomed a product at Best Buy then bought it from Amazon. Only 8% came back to BestBuy.com7

Joly's move: stop fighting the price, sell the floor

On November 13, 2012, at the Best Buy Theater in Times Square, Joly laid out a plan called Renew Blue, built on five plain pillars: improve the customer experience, energize employees, deepen vendor relationships, cut costs to lift returns, and grow sales.2 Read carelessly, it sounds like every turnaround deck ever written. Read carefully, it is a confession: Best Buy could not win a price war with a company that ran on thinner margins by design, so it would stop fighting one. The thesis of the whole turnaround sits in a single reframe — Best Buy is not a price-match battleground, it is the only national showroom for electronics, and a showroom's tenants should pay rent.

The first step was defensive and almost humiliating: match Amazon's prices, take the margin hit, and stop the customer from leaving with a barcode in their phone. That bought time, nothing more. The real move was the store-within-a-store. Instead of Best Buy stocking and merchandising every brand on its own dime, vendors built and paid for their own branded mini-stores inside the floor. By fiscal 2014 Best Buy had opened 1,400 Samsung and 600 Windows stores-within-a-store.4 The suppliers got a premium stage for their products against rivals; Best Buy got someone else funding the showroom that had been bleeding it dry. The genius is the inversion: the very feature Amazon was exploiting for free — physical display — became the thing Best Buy could sell to the brands Amazon also depended on.

The old Best BuyRenew Blue's showroom
Who pays for the displayBest BuyThe vendor (Samsung, Microsoft)
What the store competes onPrice vs. AmazonExperience and expert help
What showrooming costs Best BuyA lost saleLess — the vendor funded the stage
The fight being foughtOne it could not winOne Amazon can't easily copy
Two ways to run an electronics floor

While the vendors rebuilt the floor, Joly attacked the cost base with a discipline the headline numbers understate. The original Renew Blue target was $725 million in annualized cost reductions. After a single fiscal year, Best Buy beat it, reporting $765 million; by the third quarter of fiscal 2015 the figure reached $965 million.4 That cash bought the only thing a dying retailer actually needs: time. And the early signs of life showed up in the right places — domestic online sales rose 20% in fiscal 2014,4 dragging the website out of its time warp, while total revenue troughed near $39.8 billion in fiscal 2013 and recovered toward $42.4 billion in fiscal 2014.5

When you can't win the fight, change who pays for the ring

Best Buy's structural weakness was that it carried the full cost of a service — letting people see and touch products — that its competitor consumed for free. The turnaround move wasn't to do that service better or cheaper. It was to find the third party who valued the service more than the customer did, and bill them for it. The vendors needed the shelf, the demo, the expert in the blue shirt, more than any single shopper did. So Best Buy stopped treating the floor as a cost of selling and started treating it as inventory it could rent. When a feature is being exploited for free, the question isn't 'how do I defend it?' It's 'who else would pay for it?'

Wasn't it just luck, a friendly founder, and a kind market?

The honest objection is that Joly arrived with a safety net and good timing, not a strategy. Founder Richard Schulze was circling that same summer with an informal bid of roughly $8 to $10 billion, around $24 to $26 a share — a meaningful premium that looked, in the press, like a floor under the stock.6 If a buyout was coming, why credit the operator? The answer is that the net was never real. By late February 2013 Schulze's bid collapsed because he couldn't line up the financing, and Best Buy's board noted it had received no formal offer at all.6 The takeout everyone assumed would save the company evaporated; the operational triage had to actually work.

...in a 10-year time warp.8
Best Buy's e-commerce presidentOn the state of BestBuy.com in 2013, when online was only ~6% of revenue against ~25% of industry sales online

The fairer version of the objection is that Best Buy didn't beat Amazon so much as survive it — and that's correct, but it's the point, not the rebuttal. Renew Blue was never a plan to defeat the internet's lowest prices; it was a plan to stop being the cheapest way for Amazon to acquire a customer. The vendor-funded floor, the cost cuts, the price-matching, the patched-up website all did one job: keep Best Buy alive and intact long enough to build something Amazon genuinely struggles to replicate at scale — the physical, human, in-store service business that ships, installs, and supports the things people buy. You can't easily out-warehouse Amazon. You can stand in the one place it can't: the room where the customer is holding the product, deciding.

Best Buy's survival is usually filed under 'how a retailer beat Amazon,' and that label gets the moral exactly backwards. Joly never tried to be Amazon, and he never beat Amazon at being Amazon. He looked at the one thing his company had that the internet's biggest store wanted — a floor where people make up their minds — and instead of giving it away for free, he started charging the people who needed it most. The showroom didn't kill Best Buy. Once someone else paid the rent, it saved it.

Take it further — The Turnaround
Worksheet

Turnaround Diagnosis Worksheet

A worksheet that forces a turnaround down to first principles: is this a cash problem, a cost problem, or a strategy problem — and which one will kill you first. It separates the bleeding you must stop this week from the rebuild that takes years. Blank to triage your own situation; filled as the worked example tracing how the story's leader sequenced survival before revival.

Preview the blank →

The worked example unlocks with a subscription. See plans →

Sources

Where this comes from — the filings, records, and reporting behind it.

  1. 1
    Primary · Company recordDocumented
    Best Buy appointed Hubert Joly as President and CEO on August 20, 2012; Joly's official start date was September 4, 2012.
  2. 2
    SecondaryWidely reported
    Renew Blue was formally presented to investors on November 13, 2012 at Best Buy Theater in Times Square, with five pillars: improve customer experience, energize employees, deepen vendor relationships, increase ROI through cost cuts, and grow sales. Best Buy's stock had sunk below $15 by that date.
  3. 3
    Primary · SEC filingDocumented
    Best Buy's FY2012 (ended March 2012) revenue was $50.705 billion. The SEC 10-K also shows FY2011 revenue of $49.747B and FY2010 of $49.243B — a multi-year plateau that preceded the drop.
  4. 4
    Primary · Company recordDocumented
    After only one fiscal year of Renew Blue, Best Buy exceeded its original $725M annualized cost reduction target, delivering $765M. By Q3 FY2015, total Renew Blue annualized cost reductions reached $965M ($695M SG&A, $270M other). The company also opened 1,400 Samsung and 600 Windows stores-within-a-store and increased domestic online sales 20% in FY2014.
  5. 5
    Primary · SEC filingDocumented
    Best Buy's FY2014 10-K shows revenue of $42.410B (vs $39.827B FY2013 and $41.311B FY2012 by Best Buy's fiscal calendar), confirming a revenue trough in FY2013 followed by partial recovery.
  6. 6
    SecondaryWidely reported
    Founder Richard Schulze made an informal bid in August 2012 to buy Best Buy for approximately $8–10 billion ($24–$26/share), representing a 36–47% premium. The deal collapsed by late February 2013 when Schulze failed to secure financing; Best Buy stated it had received no formal offer.
  7. 7
    SecondaryAttributed to source
    At the time of Best Buy's crisis (2012), 71% of Best Buy showroomers ended up buying from Amazon, and only 8% returned to BestBuy.com. Among all showroomers across retailers, 24% most frequently showroomed at Best Buy — the highest of any retailer surveyed — reflecting electronics' acute vulnerability to the practice.
  8. 8
    SecondaryWidely reported
    Best Buy lost $1.2 billion during fiscal 2012 and had more than 1,400 store locations. Its e-commerce president acknowledged the website was 'in a 10-year time warp' and online sales were only ~6% of revenue despite ~25% of all consumer electronics industry sales occurring online.