Keep a rule about how the company works once it starts to cost money, or change it.
9 of 11 judged decisions were never undone, and 2 were kept only in part.
A rule about people is rarely taken back. It is either paid for in the bad year, or dropped when the bad year arrives.
The steelmaker that cut every paycheck
In 2009 the steel market fell off a cliff, and Nucor lost money for the first full year in its history: a $294 million net loss. The obvious move was to lay people off. Nucor laid off none of its roughly 20,000 employees.
Instead, everybody was paid less. Hours were cut and production bonuses shrank, so the payroll fell with the output and nobody lost a job. A plant manager described the rule like this.
“It's not a policy, but it's a practice.”A Nucor plant manager, as recorded in the Nucor case
Two years earlier Circuit City faced its own version of the question and answered it the other way. On March 28, 2007 it fired 3,400 store employees, about 9 percent of its in-store workforce, not for performance but because they were earning "well above the market-based salary range for their role". Its rule was that a wage above the market rate is waste. It filed for bankruptcy on November 10, 2008.
Both companies kept their rule, and neither rule was ever reversed. That is what makes this decision unusual. A rule about how a company treats its people is almost never taken back. It goes on making decisions, for better or worse, long after anyone remembers making it. The rest of this guide is about choosing which rule you are willing to live with.
What culture doctrine is
A culture doctrine is a rule about how a company works, such as how it pays, whom it hires or what it refuses to do, that it keeps even when breaking it would save money. The decision is whether to keep the rule, change it or drop it once it starts to cost something.
Every company has values on a wall. A doctrine is the part that actually changes decisions. Nucor's pay rule decided who would carry a $294 million loss. A value that never costs anything is a slogan, and slogans are not what this guide is about.
Why it is so hard
On paper a doctrine is free: it is a sentence. In a real company, three things make it expensive to keep and hard to change.
Its payoff is hard to prove
The cost of keeping a rule lands in one quarter's numbers. The benefit is spread over years and rarely shows up in a filing. Unilever built its strategy on the belief that "brands with purpose grow", and spent years applying it to every brand before anyone could show which ones it helped.
It was written for a smaller company
A rule that works when everyone has met the founder works differently when most people never will. Toyota nearly doubled its workforce in a decade, from 183,000 to 321,000, and found it ever harder to teach new hires its way of working.
Nobody is asked to review it
A rule outlives the people who wrote it, and no budget meeting puts it on the agenda. It tends to change when the leader changes or a crisis forces it, and rarely on purpose in between.
The ways companies did it
The decisions on record take four shapes. Each is an answer to the same question: what happens to the rule when it starts to cost money?
Keep the rule and pay its price
Treat the cost as the point, and pay it in the bad year.
- Nucor
- Kept every job through its 2009 loss of $294 million by letting the payroll fall with production. Its own filing to the SEC said "our pay-for-performance culture has allowed us to avoid layoffs".
- Trader Joe's
- Has run since 1977 on a short shelf of mostly its own-label goods, staffed by well-paid crew who do every job in the store. As of 2024 a store reportedly does around $2,100 in sales per square foot, roughly double Whole Foods.
Let the cycle decide
Keep the words while they are cheap, and act against them when the money turns.
- Salesforce
- Described its workforce as its 'Ohana, a family bound together and responsible for one another. In early 2023 it cut roughly 7,000 people, about 10% of the company, citing pandemic-era overhiring. Its 2024 proxy statement describes the culture without using the word at all, and Marc Benioff later called the layoffs a "complete dumpster fire".
- Circuit City
- Fired 3,400 store staff in 2007 because their pay was above the market range. Its chief executive resigned in September 2008, seven weeks before the bankruptcy filing.
Change the words for a bigger company
Keep the spirit, and rewrite the sentence that no longer fits.
- Meta
- On May 2, 2014 changed its internal motto from "Move fast and break things" to "Move fast with stable infrastructure", a change reported as driven by "the demands placed on a massive, publicly traded company".
- Netflix
- In June 2024 renamed the "Freedom and Responsibility" part of its culture memo "People Over Process" and softened the Keeper Test, the part implying that adequate is never good enough. The vacation and expense policies stayed exactly as they were.
- Amazon
- On July 1, 2021, days before Jeff Bezos stepped down, went from 14 Leadership Principles to 16, adding "Strive to be Earth's Best Employer" and "Success and Scale Bring Broad Responsibility".
Admit the rule stopped paying
Turn around when the rule visibly costs more than it earns.
- Ryanair
- Was rude to customers on purpose until late 2013 brought two profit warnings and a survey naming it the worst brand for customer service. In March 2014 it launched "Always Getting Better": lower fees, allocated seating and a booking flow cut from 17 clicks to 5. In fiscal 2024 profit after tax rose 34% to €1.92bn.
- Unilever
- In October 2023 a new chief executive said it would stop "force fitting" purpose onto all 400 of its brands, and kept it for the brands where it fits. By 2024 underlying return on invested capital had improved 190 basis points to 18.1%. His successor has since issued a new doctrine for the whole portfolio.
What 13 companies did
Here is every decision on record, placed by the year it was made and marked by how it turned out. Hover a mark, or open the table, for the company and the outcome.
13 keeping the company's rules decisions, 1977 to 2024
Each mark is one decision. "Never undone" means the company did not reverse it, not that it worked.
Show as a table
| Company | Year | Choice | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trader Joe's | 1977 | Lean private-label model | Never undone |
| Toyota | 1995 | Scale headcount for share | Never undone |
| Boeing | 2001 | Move headquarters to Chicago | Never undone |
| Circuit City | 2007 | Fire the overpaid veterans | Never undone |
| Nucor | 2009 | Shrink every paycheck | Never undone |
| Red Bull | 2012 | Build owned content | Never undone |
| Meta | 2014 | Adopt stable infrastructure | Never undone |
| Ryanair | 2014 | Reverse and restore comfort | Never undone |
| Amazon | 2021 | Add new principles | Too early to call |
| Salesforce | 2023 | Cut headcount to the cycle | Never undone |
| Unilever | 2023 | Narrow purpose to brands that fit | Kept in part |
| Netflix | 2024 | Soften the firing logic | Kept in part |
| Starbucks | 2024 | Rebuild the third place | Too early to call |
Of the 11 decisions that can be judged, 9 were never undone and 2 were kept only in part. Rules about people are sticky.
Read "never undone" carefully here. Circuit City's pay cut was never undone either; the company was in bankruptcy within twenty months. Boeing's 2001 move of its headquarters from Seattle to Chicago, "separate from our existing operations", was never undone, and in 2020 a congressional report on the 737 MAX found a "disturbing pattern of technical miscalculations and troubling management misjudgments". A doctrine that holds is not the same as a doctrine that works.
A few cases on record sit at the edge of the decision: a marketing budget or a headquarters move that a company made because of what it believed. They are kept because the belief, not the spending, was the decision.
How to run this decision
If you are weighing a version of this choice, here is what the record suggests doing, in order.
- Write down what the rule refuses, not what it values
Values are free and refusals are not. Nucor's rule refuses layoffs; Circuit City's refused any wage above the market rate. If you cannot say what the company will not do even when it hurts, you have a slogan, and a slogan cannot be priced or defended.
Seen in: Nucor, 2009 · Circuit City, 2007 - Price the rule in the worst year you can imagine
The test is not whether you believe the rule when business is good. Nucor's rule cost money in a downturn by design; that was when it mattered. Model the year you would most want to break it, and decide now whether you can pay.
Seen in: Nucor, 2009 - List the decisions the rule will make for you
Circuit City's layoff was not one decision. It followed from an earlier position that a wage above the market rate is waste. Write out the next five decisions your rule implies, because those are the ones nobody will reopen.
Seen in: Circuit City, 2007 · Boeing, 2001 - Test the rule at ten times the size
Rules are written by small companies and inherited by large ones. Toyota's workforce nearly doubled in a decade; Netflix softened its Keeper Test because it was too sharp to live with at scale. Ask what the sentence means to someone who will never meet its author.
Seen in: Toyota, 1995 · Netflix, 2024 · Meta, 2014 - Separate the rule from the person who wrote it
Unilever narrowed its purpose doctrine under one chief executive, and a new portfolio-wide doctrine replaced the narrowing under the next one. If a rule survives only as long as its author, it is that person's preference, and should be described to the company as one.
Seen in: Unilever, 2023 - Put a date on reviewing it, before a crisis does
Ryanair changed course only after two profit warnings and a worst-brand survey made the cost impossible to ignore. Set a date and an owner for rereading the rule, measured in years, and treat the absence of complaints as no evidence at all.
Seen in: Ryanair, 2014
Warning signs
What it has looked like when this decision was going wrong.
- The rule is described as a value or a feeling, with nothing it refuses attached.Salesforce, 2023
- Nobody has worked out what the rule costs in a bad year.Circuit City, 2007
- Headcount is growing faster than the culture can teach it.Toyota, 1995
- One rule is applied the same way to every part of a very different business.Unilever, 2023
- The people who set the rule sit far from the work it governs.Boeing, 2001
All 13 cases
Each case is one company at one decision: what was on the table, what it chose, why, and what followed, with every fact sourced.
Never undone · 9
- Trader Joe's, 1977Lean private-label model
- Toyota, 1995Scale headcount for share
- Boeing, 2001Move headquarters to Chicago
- Circuit City, 2007Fire the overpaid veterans
- Nucor, 2009Shrink every paycheck
- Red Bull, 2012Build owned content
- Meta, 2014Adopt stable infrastructure
- Ryanair, 2014Reverse and restore comfort
- Salesforce, 2023Cut headcount to the cycle
Kept in part · 2
- Unilever, 2023Narrow purpose to brands that fit
- Netflix, 2024Soften the firing logic
Too early to call · 2
- Amazon, 2021Add new principles
- Starbucks, 2024Rebuild the third place
Questions
- What is a culture doctrine?
- A rule about how a company works, such as how it pays, whom it hires or what it refuses to do, that it keeps even when breaking the rule would save money. It differs from a value statement because it changes real decisions and has a real cost.
- What are examples of culture doctrines?
- Nucor's practice of cutting pay rather than jobs in a downturn, Trader Joe's well-paid crews who do every job in the store, Netflix's culture memo, Amazon's Leadership Principles and Ryanair's deliberately abrasive service, which it reversed in 2014.
- Can a company change its culture doctrine?
- Yes, though the changes on record are usually partial. Meta rewrote its motto, Netflix softened one part of its memo and kept the rest, and Unilever narrowed its purpose doctrine to the brands it fits. Outright reversals are rare.
- Why do culture doctrines fail?
- Usually not by being reversed. They fail by being kept after they stop fitting the company, as at Circuit City, or by being quietly dropped the first time they cost money, which shows they were slogans rather than rules.
More from Stratrix
“What does your doctrine refuse, and can you pay for it in a bad year?”
See the pack — $499 →All Access
Every Casebook, three Strategy Packs a seat each year and the Analyst, for teams that face these decisions all year.
$1,999 a year · $499 a seatWhat is included →Test a decision, free
Set a live decision against the companies that made it before you.
AcquisitionsThe Distance TestDivestituresThe Divestiture TestDiversificationThe Diversification TestMake or buyThe Make-or-Buy TestNew analyses, by email
The defining moves in business, checked against the record, as they publish.