Choose which part of the business makes the money, which part it carries, and how the money gets from one to the other.
16 of 19 judged decisions were never undone. 2 were walked back and 1 was kept only in part.
The subsidies that lasted were built in, as a lease, a fee or a float. The ones walked back leaned on a payer that was bought on a forecast, or that came under pressure of its own.
The burger company that became a landlord
In 1956 McDonald's was a young franchise business that earned its money from franchisees. That year it set up a separate company, Franchise Realty Corporation, to buy cheap land along well-traveled roads.
The idea was simple. Headquarters would lease the land and the building, then sublease the package to the franchisee, who paid as much as a 40% markup on the root lease. The franchisee got a restaurant. McDonald's got a tenant.
Decades later the side business had become the main one. In 2009 McDonald's collected $4,841.0 million in rent from its franchised restaurants, and $2,379.8 million in royalties.
Rent has run roughly two to one over royalties for decades. The brand is what customers see. The real estate is what pays.
That is the whole decision in one story: inside one company, one business makes the money and another is carried by it. McDonald's chose which was which on purpose, before its future restaurants were built, and built the pipe between them. This guide is about making that choice on purpose.
What cross-subsidy is
A cross-subsidy is when one part of a business makes the money that keeps another part going. As a strategy, it means deciding which part pays, which part is carried, and how the money moves between them.
This guide calls the part that makes the money the payer, and the part it carries the passenger. Sometimes the passenger is a bet on the future, like a new console or a streaming service. Sometimes it is the face of the company, like a newspaper or a brand, and the payer is something customers never think about: land, insurance float, cloud servers, bag fees.
Why it is so hard
Every company with more than one business has some money moving between them. Three things make doing it on purpose hard.
It is invisible until someone draws the line
Blended results hide who pays for whom. Alphabet's 2015 restructuring followed a worry that cash was being tunneled from search into long-shot ventures unchecked. The new structure let shareholders see it.
The payer has a cycle; the passenger's bill does not
A newspaper's losses, a console's losses, a research budget: they arrive every year. The payer's profits come and go. Samsung's chip division, the group's usual payer, lost roughly KRW 14.87 trillion in 2023.
Someone is always paying, and they notice
The managers and customers of the paying business carry a cost they did not choose. When Samsung's memory arm nearly doubled the price of the chips it sold to its own phone arm, the phone-and-appliance division's operating profit fell 38%.
The passenger's bill does not move with the payer
The passenger costs about the same in good years and bad. The subsidy breaks when the payer has a bad year.
The ways companies did it
The decisions on record take four shapes. They differ in where the payer comes from, and in how visible the subsidy is.
Design the payer into the model
Create a source of money that arrives whether or not the visible business has a good year: a lease, a fee, a float.
- Ryanair
- In 2006 started charging €2.50 per checked bag and cut every fare by €2.50, calling the pair "revenue neutral". By the year to March 2012 ancillary revenue was €886 million; in the most recent year it was €4.99 billion of €15.54 billion in group revenue.
- Berkshire Hathaway
- In March 1967 paid $8.6 million for an insurer, National Indemnity, to invest the gap between collecting premiums and paying claims. Float was $19.4 million then and about $171 billion at the end of 2024.
Run a new business at a loss on purpose
Let a profitable business pay for a new one while it grows.
- Microsoft
- Launched the Xbox in November 2001 knowing it would lose money on each console, because Windows and Office made enough cash to carry it. The Home and Entertainment division lost roughly $348 million in the December 2002 quarter.
- Disney
- Priced Disney+ at $6.99 in 2019, below what it would cost to serve. "We want to reach as many people as possible with it," said Bob Iger. The streaming loss widened to $693 million in the launch quarter, and the cable networks, up 23%, covered it.
- Amazon
- From 2003 built its data-center skill into a cloud business it could sell. In 2024 AWS made $39.8 billion of operating income on $107.6 billion of revenue, a 37.04% margin, while North American retail ran at 6.44%.
Buy a payer, or buy a passenger with the payer's cash
Acquire the business that is supposed to make the money, or use one business's cash to buy another.
- Sears
- In 1981 agreed to buy the brokerage Dean Witter for $607 million, expecting its 36 million regular customer families to buy financial products where they shopped. By 1995 it had sold or spun off every financial unit.
- Philip Morris
- Used cigarette cash to buy Kraft for roughly $13.1 billion in 1988, raising its offer to $106 a share. In 2007 Altria handed the 88.9% of Kraft it still held to its shareholders.
- CVS Health
- Bought the insurer Aetna in 2018 to be the engine of an integrated health company. In 2024 the insurance arm's adjusted operating income was $307 million, down from $5,577 million the year before.
Make the subsidy visible, move it, or end it
Change the structure so everyone can see who pays, set the internal price, or cut the passenger loose.
- Alphabet (Google)
- Split Google into Alphabet in 2015, walling off the ad business from the moonshots. Other Bets lost about $24.3 billion through mid-2021; in 2024 Google Services earned $121.3 billion of operating income while Other Bets lost about $4.4 billion.
- Samsung
- In the first quarter of 2026 nearly doubled the internal price its memory division charged its own phone arm. The chip division made 93.8% of group operating profit, while the phone-and-appliance division's profit fell 38%.
- The Washington Post Company
- For more than five years leaned on profits from its Kaplan education business while the newspaper lost money. When Kaplan's enrollment fell more than 37% in three years, it sold the paper in 2013 for $250 million and renamed itself Graham Holdings.
What 21 companies did
Here is every decision on record, placed by the year it was made and marked by how it turned out. Hover a mark, or open the table, for the company and the outcome.
21 letting one business pay for another decisions, 1956 to 2026
Each mark is one decision. "Never undone" means the company did not reverse it, not that it worked.
Show as a table
| Company | Year | Choice | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald's | 1956 | Own the ground, sublease | Never undone |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 1967 | Buy insurer, invest float | Never undone |
| Sears | 1981 | Buy into financial services | Walked back |
| Philip Morris | 1988 | Buy Kraft at raised bid | Walked back |
| IBM | 1993 | Keep IBM whole | Too early to call |
| PepsiCo | 1997 | Spin off chains | Never undone |
| Microsoft | 2001 | Price Xbox below cost | Never undone |
| Amazon | 2003 | Build cloud as a service | Never undone |
| Ryanair | 2006 | Charge bag fee, cut fares | Never undone |
| UnitedHealth Group | 2011 | Unify under Optum brand | Never undone |
| The Washington Post Company | 2013 | Sell the newspaper, keep Kaplan | Never undone |
| Alphabet (Google) | 2015 | Restructure into Alphabet | Never undone |
| CVS Health | 2018 | Acquire Aetna insurer | Never undone |
| Disney | 2019 | Price low to buy reach | Never undone |
| Sony | 2019 | Keep integrated | Never undone |
| United Airlines | 2020 | Collateralize MileagePlus for debt | Never undone |
| Samsung | 2022 | Hold capex, keep building | Never undone |
| Delta Air Lines | 2023 | Make spend the only currency | Kept in part |
| Comcast | 2024 | Spin off cable networks | Never undone |
| PepsiCo | 2025 | Cut SKUs and lower snack prices | Too early to call |
| Samsung | 2026 | Raise internal DRAM price | Never undone |
Of the 19 decisions that can be judged, 16 were never undone, 2 were walked back and 1 was kept only in part.
"Never undone" does not mean the subsidy lasted forever. The Washington Post Company's decision to sell its paper is on record as held. It held because the subsidy had already ended.
Nor does it mean the subsidy worked. CVS kept Aetna, and the insurance arm's adjusted operating income fell to $307 million in 2024. Samsung kept building memory chips through the downturn, and SK Hynix passed it in DRAM revenue share, 36% to 34%, ending a lead Samsung had held since 1992. Both decisions stood; neither payer paid as planned.
The walk-backs started on the side that was supposed to make the money. Sears bought its payer on a forecast. Philip Morris spent cigarette cash on Kraft to get away from a declining, increasingly regulated cigarette market, and Altria handed the food business back to its shareholders in 2007.
The subsidies that held had something in common too: the money moved through a mechanism that worked whether or not anyone's forecast came true. McDonald's collects rent. Ryanair collects the bag fee. Berkshire invests the float. None of these depends on customers deciding to buy something new.
Sears is the clearest contrast. Its plan depended on 36 million customer families choosing to buy financial products where they bought everything else. That was a hope, not a pipe. A subsidy you build is a contract. A subsidy you buy is a forecast.
How to run this decision
If you are weighing a version of this choice, here is what the record suggests doing, in order.
- Name the payer and the passenger in writing, with this year's numbers
Write the sentence out: this unit earned this much, that unit lost this much, and the difference moved between them. If nobody can write it, nobody has decided it, and the subsidy is running on habit.
Seen in: Alphabet (Google), 2015 - Make the transfer a mechanism, not an expectation
A mechanism produces the money whether or not the strategy works: a lease, a fee, an internal price, a float. An expectation that customers will start buying something new is a forecast, and forecasts are what got walked back.
Seen in: McDonald's, 1956 · Ryanair, 2006 · Sears, 1981 - Size the passenger's loss before you launch it, and say when it ends
Microsoft knew the Xbox would sell at a loss; Disney set its price knowing it was below cost. A loss with a size and an end date is a budget line that can be defended in a bad quarter. A loss discovered afterwards becomes an argument every quarter.
Seen in: Microsoft, 2001 · Disney, 2019 - Be suspicious of buying the payer
Buying a business to make the money for the rest means paying today for profits that are only a forecast. If the plan depends on customers or synergies that do not exist yet, build the payer out of something you already do well enough to sell, as Amazon did with its data centers.
Seen in: Sears, 1981 · CVS Health, 2018 · Amazon, 2003 - Plan for the payer's worst year, not its best
If the passenger's cost is fixed and the payer's profits rise and fall, the subsidy will break in some year you can predict. Work out which year that is, and decide now what you will do when it comes: cut the passenger, sell it, or borrow.
Seen in: Samsung, 2022 · The Washington Post Company, 2013 - Check who is paying, and whether they know
The paying unit's managers and customers carry a cost they did not choose. Make the internal price and the transfer visible to them, and ask once a year whether the money is building something or covering for something that is slipping.
Seen in: Samsung, 2026 · UnitedHealth Group, 2011
Warning signs
What it has looked like when this decision was going wrong.
- The subsidy shows up in a segment report rather than in a decision anyone remembers making.Alphabet (Google), 2015
- The case for an acquisition says synergy and names no fee, lease or internal price.Sears, 1981
- The passenger's loss has no size and no end date.Alphabet's Other Bets
- The payer's best year is being used to budget the passenger's next five.Samsung, 2022
All 21 cases
Each case is one company at one decision: what was on the table, what it chose, why, and what followed, with every fact sourced.
Never undone · 16
- McDonald's, 1956Own the ground, sublease
- Berkshire Hathaway, 1967Buy insurer, invest float
- PepsiCo, 1997Spin off chains
- Microsoft, 2001Price Xbox below cost
- Amazon, 2003Build cloud as a service
- Ryanair, 2006Charge bag fee, cut fares
- UnitedHealth Group, 2011Unify under Optum brand
- The Washington Post Company, 2013Sell the newspaper, keep Kaplan
- Alphabet (Google), 2015Restructure into Alphabet
- CVS Health, 2018Acquire Aetna insurer
- Disney, 2019Price low to buy reach
- Sony, 2019Keep integrated
- United Airlines, 2020Collateralize MileagePlus for debt
- Samsung, 2022Hold capex, keep building
- Comcast, 2024Spin off cable networks
- Samsung, 2026Raise internal DRAM price
Kept in part · 1
- Delta Air Lines, 2023Make spend the only currency
Walked back · 2
- Sears, 1981Buy into financial services
- Philip Morris, 1988Buy Kraft at raised bid
Too early to call · 2
- IBM, 1993Keep IBM whole
- PepsiCo, 2025Cut SKUs and lower snack prices
Questions
- What is a cross-subsidy in business?
- When one part of a company makes the money that keeps another part going. McDonald's earns more from renting land and buildings to its franchisees than from royalties on its brand, and rent has run roughly two to one over royalties for decades.
- Is cross-subsidization good or bad?
- Neither by itself. It lets a company fund a new business, or keep prices low where customers can see them. It goes wrong when nobody has decided it on purpose, when the payer is a forecast rather than a business, or when the payer has a bad year.
- What are examples of cross-subsidies?
- McDonald's real estate carrying its franchise system, Berkshire Hathaway's insurance float funding its investing, Amazon's cloud business beside its retail, Microsoft's Windows and Office carrying the first Xbox, and Disney's cable networks covering early losses at Disney+.
- Why do cross-subsidies fail?
- Usually because of the payer, not the passenger. On record, the walk-backs came after a company bought a payer whose profits were only a forecast, or after the payer came under pressure of its own.
More from Stratrix
“Which unit pays for the others, and has anybody ever approved it?”
See the pack — $499 →All Access
Every Casebook, three Strategy Packs a seat each year and the Analyst, for teams that face these decisions all year.
$1,999 a year · $499 a seatWhat is included →Weekly email
Stratonomics, every Tuesday
One data story every Tuesday: what happened, what it means, and the figures you can quote. Free.