Decision speed is a strategy variable, not a personality trait. This 12-question diagnostic presents realistic scenarios — a pricing escalation, a resourcing conflict, a missed target — and maps how your organization actually resolves them. You'll land on one of five positions on the Decision Maturity Curve, with a breakdown across clarity of authority, quality of information, escalation discipline, and meeting cadence.
Decision Velocity Diagnostic
How fast can your company actually move?
A 12-question scenario-based diagnostic that maps your organization's decision-making patterns. Are you consensus-driven or top-down? Fast but inaccurate, or slow but deliberate? The report places you on a Decision Maturity Curve and identifies bottleneck patterns.
How to use this tool
For each scenario, select the response that most closely matches how decisions actually get made in your organization — not the official process, but the real one. Each scenario probes a different aspect of decision-making: speed, accuracy, escalation, and governance.
When a new market opportunity emerges, how quickly can your organization decide whether to pursue it?
Want to discuss your results?
Our strategists can help you turn these insights into action. Or explore more diagnostic tools to build a complete picture.
Why decision velocity matters
McKinsey research across 1,200+ companies found that organizations with high-quality, high-speed decisions outperform peers by a 6x margin on total returns to shareholders. The gap isn't between slow and fast — it's between organizations that have explicit decision rights and those that rely on tribal knowledge. Most companies inherit decision patterns from earlier scale stages and never revisit them, even when the business has tripled in complexity.
This diagnostic surfaces the gap between your formal decision-making process and how decisions actually get made under pressure.
The five positions on the Decision Maturity Curve
Reactive — decisions get made when something breaks. No clear authority, high escalation, rework is common.
Consultative — decisions wait for consensus. Slow but broadly supported; accountability is diffuse.
Operational — clear authority on routine decisions but novel situations default to escalation.
Strategic — authority is explicit at all levels, information flows fast, reversible decisions get made quickly.
Adaptive — decision rights flex with context, data-informed, explicit rituals for reviewing past decisions.
What to do with your result
The single highest-leverage intervention is almost always clarifying decision rights — who decides, who is consulted, who is informed — using a RACI or DACI model. Share the PDF with your leadership team and compare answers: disagreement on who owns a decision type is itself a diagnostic finding. Then build the governance fix in Stratrix, using the Management Frameworks library for structured models and the OrgDesign Health Score for a broader structural diagnostic.
Who this tool is for
- →CEOs frustrated with execution speed
- →COOs redesigning operating cadence
- →Transformation leaders post-M&A
- →Board members evaluating governance
- →Strategy teams diagnosing why plans stall