On September 28, 2025, CSX's board appointed Stephen Angel president and chief executive, effective immediately. A month later the railroad named a new finance chief. Its filing said he succeeds Sean R. Pelkey, "who separated from his employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, also effective as of October 29, 2025."
At UnitedHealth the gap was longer and the wording softer. The board appointed Stephen Hemsley chief executive on May 12, 2025. At the end of July, the company said John F. Rex, its finance chief since 2016, would "become a Strategic Advisor to the Company's Chief Executive Officer."
Neither filing links the two changes, and two companies prove nothing. But the sequence is common. The finance chief is supposed to be the steady hand through a change at the top, the one senior person who stays put while everything else moves. Across large US companies over the past 22 months, it has run the other way. Once a new chief executive arrives, the finance chief is more than twice as likely to be gone within a year, and more often than not the exit comes within six months. A new chief executive starts the finance chief's clock.
After a new boss, the finance chair empties twice as often
Start with the 2,270 US-listed companies with $1 billion or more in revenue that were still filing annual reports. Between January 2025 and the end of October 2026, 634 of them, 27.9%, changed their finance chief. Turnover in the chair is ordinary.
| After a new chief executive (named Jan to Oct 2025) | 23.5% |
|---|---|
| No new chief executive (during 2025) | 10.8% |
217 companies with a new permanent chief executive; 1,807 companies with none in 2024 or 2025. US-listed companies with $1 billion or more in revenue. Source: Stratrix analysis of Form 8-K filings (Item 5.02).
Now take the 217 companies that named a new permanent chief executive between January and October 2025, which leaves a full year to watch what happened next. Within twelve months, 51 of them, 23.5%, had lost their finance chief. Among the 1,807 companies that named no new chief executive in 2024 or 2025, 10.8% lost a finance chief during 2025.
Count any change in the finance chair, not only a departure a filing describes, and the gap widens: 39.6% after a new chief executive, against 13.1% for everyone else.
None of this proves a new boss pushed anyone out. A company that changes its chief executive may already be in flux, and some of those finance chiefs may have been ready to retire anyway. But the gap holds however the change is counted, and it opens fast. The median time from a new chief executive's appointment to the finance chief's exit was 165 days.
Only a quarter of finance chiefs leave by retiring
Companies choose their words with care when a finance chief leaves, and the words repay attention. Of the 549 departures the filings describe, retirement accounts for 136, about a quarter. Another 92 left for another job. But 98 were terminated, separated or left by mutual agreement, and 104 left with no reason given at all.
| Retired | 24.8% |
|---|---|
| Moved to another role at the company | 19.1% |
| No reason given | 18.9% |
| Terminated, separated or by mutual agreement | 17.9% |
| Left for another job | 16.8% |
| Ended by a merger or sale | 2.6% |
Share of the 549 finance chief departures described in filings, January 2025 to October 2026. Interim handovers excluded. Source: Stratrix analysis of Form 8-K filings (Item 5.02).
Then there is the advisor title. In 103 of the 549 departures, the finance chief stayed on as an advisor. That can be a long, orderly handover or a gentler word for an exit, and the title alone does not say which.
At GXO Logistics there was no new title. Its board approved Patrick Kelleher as chief executive on June 19, 2025. On August 4, the company said it and its finance chief had "mutually agreed" that he would depart.
Retailers change finance chiefs most, telecom companies least
The pace varies by industry. Over the 22 months, 36.3% of retailers and restaurant companies changed their finance chief, 57 of 157, and industrial and materials companies were close behind at 33.7%. The steadiest chairs were at banks and capital markets firms, at 20.9%, energy companies, at 21.3%, and telecom and media companies, at 14.3%, the lowest of any sector.
| Retail and restaurants | 36.3% |
|---|---|
| Industrials and materials | 33.7% |
| Wholesale and distribution | 33.3% |
| Consumer products | 32.5% |
| Health care | 31.9% |
| Technology | 29.9% |
| Insurance | 26.5% |
| Construction | 26.1% |
| Real estate | 25.7% |
| Utilities | 25% |
| Business and consumer services | 24% |
| Transportation | 23.2% |
| Energy | 21.3% |
| Banking and capital markets | 20.9% |
| Telecom and media | 14.3% |
Share of companies in each sector still filing annual reports. Source: Stratrix analysis of Form 8-K filings (Item 5.02).
Size made less difference than industry. Below $100 billion of revenue, the rate ran between 25.8% and 28.7% whatever the band; only the 46 largest companies stood out, at 34.8%. Wherever a company sits, its board faces the same question when the chief executive changes: what happens to the person who runs the money?
The interim seat is rarely an audition
A sudden exit leaves a seat to fill, and 183 of the 781 finance chief appointments in the period, 23.4%, were interim or acting. For 119 of those interims a permanent successor followed, after a median of 119 days. Only 14 interim finance chiefs were later given the job permanently.
Baxter International shows how a change at the top can run on into the finance chair, and how the gap gets filled. Its board named Andrew Hider chief executive in July 2025. In March 2026 the company disclosed a separation agreement with its finance chief, Joel Grade, with severance under its terms for an involuntary termination without cause. In August it named Hider himself interim CFO, for what it called "the anticipated two-week interim period."
That matters to the people asked to step in. It matters more to a board. An interim in the finance chair is what an empty line in the succession plan looks like.
Replacing a finance chief means buying one
When boards fill the chair permanently, they split almost evenly: 299 hired from outside and 278 promoted from inside, with 21 the filings do not make clear. The outside market is a market in sitting finance chiefs. By the titles their notices gave, 232 of the 299 outside hires, 77.6%, arrived as a sitting chief financial officer somewhere else.
Moving them costs money, and the notices say how much. Among outside hires, 52.5% received a sign-on bonus; among internal promotions, 4.7% did. Where the notice gave a base salary, the median for outside hires was $650,000, against $600,000 for promotions. Across all new permanent finance chiefs with a disclosed salary, the median was $625,000, rising from $550,000 at companies with $1 billion to $5 billion of revenue to $1,000,000 at those with $100 billion or more.
A board with no inside successor ready is shopping in a market where half the hires come with a sign-on bonus, and where the best candidates already have the job somewhere else.
Sometimes the finance chief becomes the new boss
Not every exit is a defeat. Fifteen departing finance chiefs moved straight into a chief executive's job: nine at their own company, one of them on an interim basis, four at one of its businesses and two at another company.
ConocoPhillips shows the pattern from the other side. In May 2025 its finance chief, Bill Bullock, announced his retirement, and Andy O'Brien, then a senior vice president, became chief financial officer on June 1, 2025. In August 2026 the board elected O'Brien president and chief executive, effective September 1, 2026, and named its controller, Kontessa S. Haynes-Welsh, as the next finance chief. A new chief executive and a new finance chief, in the same announcement.
The chair turns over for many reasons. A new chief executive is the one a board can see coming.
Plan both successions at once
Stratrix's Take: plan the finance chief's succession at the same time as the chief executive's, not after it. Every board's choice is its own, and a change in the finance chair is not always a failure. But when a new chief executive arrives, the odds say the finance chief may follow within months, and a board that has not decided what it wants from the chair risks finding an interim in it. Two questions belong on the agenda the week a new chief executive is named: who would run finance if the finance chief left, and does the new chief executive want the current one to stay?
For a finance chief, the arrival of a new boss is the moment for a direct conversation about whether the partnership works, before the answer arrives as a new title with the word "advisor" in it. For the people who sell to finance teams or recruit for them, a new chief executive is an early, public signal that a finance chief search may follow.
People, in your inbox with the rest of Stratrix. Free.
Share this piece
Sources
- Stratrix analysis of Form 8-K filings, Item 5.02, January 2025 to October 2026
- CSX Corporation, Form 8-K (2025-09-29)
- CSX Corporation, Form 8-K (2025-10-29)
- UnitedHealth Group Inc., Form 8-K (2025-05-14)
- UnitedHealth Group Inc., Form 8-K (2025-07-31)
- GXO Logistics, Inc., Form 8-K (2025-08-05)
- Baxter International Inc., Form 8-K (2025-07-07)
- Baxter International Inc., Form 8-K (2026-03-16)
- Baxter International Inc., Form 8-K (2026-08-19)
- ConocoPhillips, Form 8-K (2025-05-08)
- ConocoPhillips, Form 8-K (2026-08-11)
Not investment advice. Figures cover US-listed companies with $1 billion or more in annual revenue that filed an annual report in 2025 or 2026, and the finance chief changes they reported on Form 8-K (Item 5.02) between January 1, 2025 and October 30, 2026. Reasons are as the companies described them. Sources: company filings with the SEC.
For information and strategic analysis only, not investment advice. Stratrix does not recommend buying, selling or holding any security.
Tools to try
- Change readiness checkFramework: Kotter's 8-Step Change Model
- Ansoff move finderFramework: Ansoff Matrix
- Business model canvas builderFramework: Business Model Canvas
- Five Forces scorerFramework: Porter's Five Forces
- SMART goal builderFramework: SMART Goals
- SWOT builderFramework: SWOT Analysis
More from Stratrix
The Founder Doctrine Casebook
Every verified case of this decision, with what was on the table and how it turned out, in Excel, PowerPoint, Word and PDF.
34 verified cases · $299See the casebook →Strategic Decisions
The big calls companies keep facing, told through the 819 companies on record that made them.
24 decisionsFind your decision →Test a decision, free
Set a live decision against the companies that made it before you.
AcquisitionsThe Distance TestDivestituresThe Divestiture TestDiversificationThe Diversification TestMake or buyThe Make-or-Buy TestNew analyses, by email
The defining moves in business, and what they teach, as they publish.