Digital download. All sales are final: no refunds or returns. Each format can be downloaded 3 times, and the links stay valid for 30 days. If you need more, reply to your confirmation email and we will sort it out.
Almost every board discussion of succession is about the candidate. The binding question is what the job is shaped like, and it is answerable before anybody is chosen. Two numbers describe it: how long the successor actually gets before a verdict forms — not the stated commitment, the real one, visible in how long the last two got — and how long a major decision in this business takes to show a result, measured from completed decisions rather than from a plan. Where the second is longer than the first, no decision the successor makes can finish inside the time they have, so the verdict is formed on their predecessor's decisions and the replacement inherits the same arithmetic. This pack computes both clocks from records the board already keeps, returns the gap in months and as a share of one decision cycle, and prices the profit running through commitments the successor did not make. It stops on two conditions: nobody has said how long the successor gets, and nobody has measured how long a decision here takes.
The test that runs through every file
A successor is judged on a clock set by the board, and the decisions they are judged on run on a longer one set by the business. It is the argument in the deck, it becomes the wizard’s axes, it drives the model’s inputs, and it reappears as lines on the checklist. That is what makes 16 files a product rather than 16 documents.
The model resolves to one number you can negotiate with: The verdict gap — the decision cycle less the window you are offering. It ships blank and worked, and every input is a named cell rather than a figure buried inside a formula, so the number arrives with its assumptions attached rather than on its own authority.
What is in the Verdict Window Strategy Pack
- Foundations. The framework: the two timescales, the verdict gap, why nobody decides to become impatient, and the two halts.
- Concept deck. Twenty-one slides for a board or nominations committee session, with nine sourced successions and what each does not establish.
- Decision wizard. Eight scored questions returning the band, the weakest answer, and either of the two halt conditions.
- Succession model. Eleven candidate verdict windows across the columns, the gap in months, what share of a cycle the successor gets, and the window a full cycle would need.
- Strategies and tactics. The moves at each of the four positions, what to do when the model halts, and four ways to lengthen a window without asking for patience.
- Case studies. Nine sourced successions — two where the clocks matched, five where the window was a fraction of the cycle, and one on a clock that is not quarterly.
- Fit worksheet. The single page of record: both clocks, the gap, the inherited share, and what the board has written down.
- Roadmap template. Five phases with gates and owners, the assumptions register, a trigger and a quarterly reporting line.
- Practitioner manual. Recovering the real window, measuring the cycle, counting the inherited share, the board paper, six failure modes and their indicators.
- Field checklist. The one-pager that survives outside the binder.
- About the package. What each file does and the order in which to run them.
An honest note on fit
This is a kit for running a decision, not a research report and not a course. It is worth buying if a real decision is in front of you and you would otherwise start from a blank page. It is not worth buying to read.
Worked examples use an explicitly fictional business, labeled on every file that contains one, with numbers tuned to teach rather than to flatter — each worked case is built so that the decision does not simply come out well, and so that what settles it is the test the pack exists to run. A worked example where everything works is a brochure. The price excludes customization, implementation and support, and where the pack reasons beyond its evidence it says so on the page.
Questions
- What is the Verdict Window Strategy Pack?
- The Verdict Window Strategy Pack is a decision-support kit for one question: How long does your next chief executive actually get? It contains 16 files — foundations, concept deck, decision wizard, succession model, strategies and tactics, case studies, fit worksheet, roadmap template, practitioner manual, field checklist, about the package — built around a single organizing test: a successor is judged on a clock set by the board, and the decisions they are judged on run on a longer one set by the business. It is what a leadership team uses to run the decision and leave a record of what they assumed, rather than a report about the topic.
- Who is the Verdict Window Strategy Pack for?
- Anyone who has to make this call and answer for it: an operator or owner facing the decision, the executive team running it, the board or investor testing the reasoning, or an adviser who would otherwise build the framework from a blank page. It is worth buying when a real decision is in front of you. It is not worth buying to read.
- What is in the Verdict Window Strategy Pack?
- 16 files in Word, PDF, PowerPoint and Excel: Foundations (Word + PDF) — The framework: the two timescales, the verdict gap, why nobody decides to become impatient, and the two halts. Concept deck (PowerPoint + PDF) — Twenty-one slides for a board or nominations committee session, with nine sourced successions and what each does not establish. Decision wizard (Excel) — Eight scored questions returning the band, the weakest answer, and either of the two halt conditions. Succession model (Excel, blank and worked) — Eleven candidate verdict windows across the columns, the gap in months, what share of a cycle the successor gets, and the window a full cycle would need. Strategies and tactics (Word) — The moves at each of the four positions, what to do when the model halts, and four ways to lengthen a window without asking for patience. Case studies (Word) — Nine sourced successions — two where the clocks matched, five where the window was a fraction of the cycle, and one on a clock that is not quarterly. Fit worksheet (Word, blank and worked) — The single page of record: both clocks, the gap, the inherited share, and what the board has written down. Roadmap template (Word) — Five phases with gates and owners, the assumptions register, a trigger and a quarterly reporting line. Practitioner manual (Word + PDF) — Recovering the real window, measuring the cycle, counting the inherited share, the board paper, six failure modes and their indicators. Field checklist (PDF) — The one-pager that survives outside the binder. About the package (PDF) — What each file does and the order in which to run them.
- What number does the Verdict Window Strategy Pack produce?
- The verdict gap — the decision cycle less the window you are offering. The model ships blank and worked, and every input is a named cell rather than a figure buried inside a formula, so the number you take into a room arrives with its assumptions attached and can be argued with rather than merely believed.
- How is the Verdict Window Strategy Pack delivered?
- As a single download of all 16 files, immediately after payment, with the same link sent by email. It can be downloaded 3 times and the link is valid for 30 days. There is nothing to install and no account to keep.
- How much does the Verdict Window Strategy Pack cost, and is it a subscription?
- $499, one-time. It is not a subscription and there is nothing to cancel. Where the pack is revised within 180 days of your purchase, the new release is yours. The price does not include customization, implementation help or support.
- Are the worked examples in the Verdict Window Strategy Pack real companies?
- The case studies are real, sourced and dated, and each one states what its evidence does not establish. The worked model, wizard and worksheet use an explicitly fictional business, labeled as such on every file that contains one. A worked model needs roughly fifteen populated inputs; for a real company you would have public figures for perhaps four, and the rest would be estimates wearing the authority of a spreadsheet.