Quick reference
Memory aid
Five lenses: Utility (most good), Rights (respect them), Justice (fair?), Virtue (integrity), Care (relationships). Apply all five.
TL;DR
For ethical decisions: gather facts, identify stakeholders, then apply five lenses — Utilitarian (greatest good), Rights (respecting fundamental rights), Justice (fair distribution), Virtue (what would a person of integrity do?), Care (protect relationships and the vulnerable). Acknowledge trade-offs and decide defensibly.
What Is Ethical Decision-Making Framework?
When facing a tough ethical decision, examine it through five lenses: What produces the most good? (Utilitarian) What respects rights? (Rights) What is fair? (Justice) What would a virtuous person do? (Virtue) What protects relationships? (Care)
The Ethical Decision-Making Framework provides a structured process for analyzing decisions with ethical implications. It begins by gathering facts, identifying stakeholders, and clarifying the ethical issues at stake. Then it applies multiple ethical theories as lenses: Utilitarianism (greatest good for greatest number), Rights-based ethics (respecting fundamental rights), Justice (fair distribution of benefits and burdens), Virtue ethics (acting with integrity, honesty, and courage), and Care ethics (maintaining relationships and responding to vulnerability). By examining a decision through all five lenses, leaders make more nuanced, defensible ethical choices.
Five Ethical Lenses
Apply five philosophical perspectives to evaluate a decision from different moral angles.
Utilitarian
Greatest good for most
Rights
Respect individual rights
Justice
Fair and equitable?
Virtue
Reflects integrity?
Care
Protects relationships?
Origin & context
Set out in "Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making" (Issues in Ethics, 1996), which updated earlier essays from the Markkula Center at Santa Clara University and drew on centuries of moral philosophy (Aristotle, Kant, Mill). The Center's current framework uses six lenses: rights, justice, utilitarian, common good, virtue and care ethics. This page applies five of them, leaving out the common good lens.
Core Components
Utilitarian Lens
Evaluates which option produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Example
Closing a small unprofitable factory benefits shareholders and other employees but harms the local community. The utilitarian analysis weighs total benefit vs. harm.
Rights-Based Lens
Evaluates which option best respects the fundamental rights of all stakeholders.
Example
Does monitoring employee emails protect the company's right to information security? Does it violate employees' right to privacy?
Justice Lens
Evaluates whether benefits and burdens are distributed fairly among stakeholders.
Example
Is it fair that executive bonuses are maintained while front-line workers are laid off during restructuring?
Virtue Lens
Asks what a person of good character would do — considering honesty, courage, compassion, and integrity.
Example
A leader discovers a product defect. Virtue asks: what would an honest, courageous leader do? Recall the product proactively.
Care Lens
Evaluates the impact on relationships and the most vulnerable stakeholders.
Example
How will this decision affect our most vulnerable employees? What obligations do we have to those who depend on us?
The ethical lenses used in modern decision-making frameworks draw on more than two thousand years of moral philosophy, from Aristotle on justice and virtue (4th century BC) through John Locke on rights (1690) and Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism (1789) to Carol Gilligan's ethics of care (1982). The framework synthesizes millennia of moral philosophy into a practical decision tool.
When to Use Ethical Decision-Making Framework
Layoff decisions
Problem it solves: Restructuring decisions involve significant ethical trade-offs.
Real-world application
A CEO uses the framework to evaluate how to conduct layoffs: utilitarian (minimize total harm), rights (fair severance and notice), justice (equitable selection criteria), virtue (transparent communication), care (support for most affected).
Product safety decisions
Problem it solves: Cost-benefit analysis alone may not capture ethical obligations around safety.
Real-world application
An automotive company discovers a low-probability safety defect. The framework reveals that the rights and virtue lenses strongly favor recall even though utilitarian cost-benefit is ambiguous.
AI and technology ethics
Problem it solves: Technology decisions create novel ethical challenges without clear precedents.
Real-world application
A tech company uses the framework to evaluate whether to deploy facial recognition technology, analyzing privacy rights, justice implications for minority communities, and societal utility.
The different ethical lenses will sometimes point to different conclusions. This is the whole point — it forces you to grapple with the real trade-offs rather than defaulting to the easiest answer.
How to Apply Ethical Decision-Making Framework: Step by Step
Before you start
- →A decision with ethical implications
- →Willingness to consider multiple perspectives
- →Time for thoughtful analysis
Gather facts and identify stakeholders
Understand the full situation, who is affected, and what ethical issues are at stake.
Tips
- ✓List all stakeholders, including those without a voice at the table
- ✓Separate facts from assumptions
Common mistakes
- ✗Rushing to judgment without understanding the full context
Apply each ethical lens
Systematically examine the decision through utilitarian, rights, justice, virtue, and care perspectives.
Tips
- ✓Write down the analysis for each lens
- ✓Note where lenses agree and disagree
Common mistakes
- ✗Only using the lens that supports your preferred outcome
Weigh trade-offs and decide
Consider the insights from all lenses, acknowledge trade-offs, and make a decision you can defend.
Tips
- ✓Consider which stakeholders bear the most risk
- ✓Apply the newspaper test
Common mistakes
- ✗Ignoring lenses that create uncomfortable conclusions
Reflect and learn
After implementing the decision, reflect on its outcomes and what you'd do differently.
Tips
- ✓Keep an ethical decision journal
- ✓Discuss ethical dilemmas with trusted advisors
Common mistakes
- ✗Not revisiting decisions to learn from their outcomes
Value & Outcomes
Primary benefit
Provides a rigorous, multi-perspective approach to ethical decision-making that reduces bias and increases defensibility.
Additional benefits
- ✓Develops ethical reasoning capability in leaders
- ✓Creates a consistent approach to ethical dilemmas across the organization
- ✓Reduces risk of ethical failures and their consequences
What you'll learn
- →How to analyze ethical dilemmas from multiple perspectives
- →How to make defensible decisions under ethical uncertainty
- →How to articulate the ethical reasoning behind decisions
Typical outcomes
Best Practices
📋 Preparation
- •Train leaders on the five ethical lenses
- •Create a safe environment for raising ethical concerns
🚀 Execution
- •Use the framework for significant decisions, not every minor choice
- •Involve diverse perspectives in the analysis
- •Document your ethical reasoning for accountability
🔄 Follow-Up
- •Review past ethical decisions and their outcomes
- •Build a library of ethical case studies for organizational learning
💎 Pro Tips
- •The framework doesn't eliminate difficult trade-offs — it makes them explicit and forces honest engagement
- •The most dangerous ethical failures come from not recognizing a decision has ethical dimensions in the first place
The 'newspaper test' is a useful complement: Would you be comfortable if this decision appeared on the front page of a newspaper? If not, reconsider.
In 1982, when seven people died from cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules, J&J CEO James Burke decided to recall 31 million bottles at a cost of $100M — even though J&J wasn't at fault. Read through the framework, the utilitarian lens favors recall (prevent more deaths), the rights lens favors recall (consumer safety), and the virtue lens favors recall (integrity). The case has since become a standard business-school example of principled decision-making.
Limitations & Pitfalls
Different ethical lenses often produce conflicting recommendations
Mitigation: This is a feature, not a bug — the conflict highlights the real trade-offs. Use judgment to weigh the lenses.
Can slow down decision-making in fast-moving situations
Mitigation: Build ethical reasoning muscle through practice so it becomes faster; for urgent decisions, use a simplified checklist
Where this comes fromMarkkula Center for Applied Ethics (Velasquez, André, Shanks and Meyer) introduced this (1996).
More Management Frameworks
Other frameworks in the Stratrix library.
B Corp Assessment Framework
A rigorous assessment and certification framework that evaluates a company's entire social and environmental performance, using a verified score across five impact areas: Governance, Workers, Community, Environment, and Customers.
Sustainability & EthicsCircular Economy Model
An economic model that eliminates waste by design, keeping products and materials in use through reuse, repair, remanufacturing, and recycling — replacing the traditional linear 'take-make-dispose' model.
Sustainability & EthicsUN Sustainable Development Goals
A universal framework of 17 interconnected goals adopted by all UN member states, providing a shared blueprint for peace, prosperity, people, and the planet — increasingly used by organizations to align their strategy with global sustainability priorities.
Sustainability & EthicsTriple Bottom Line
A sustainability framework that measures organizational success across three dimensions — social (People), environmental (Planet), and financial (Profit) — rather than profit alone.
Marketing & CustomerCustomer Development
A four-step framework for validating business assumptions through direct customer interaction: Customer Discovery (understand the problem), Customer Validation (prove the solution sells), Customer Creation (scale demand), and Company Building (transition from startup to organization).
Strategic AnalysisPESTEL Analysis
A macro-environmental scanning framework that examines Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal factors to understand external forces shaping business conditions.
More from Stratrix
Test a decision, free
Set a live decision against the companies that made it before you.
AcquisitionsThe Distance TestDivestituresThe Divestiture TestDiversificationThe Diversification TestMake or buyThe Make-or-Buy TestAll Access
Every Casebook, three Strategy Packs a seat each year and the Analyst, for teams that face these decisions all year.
$1,999 a year · $499 a seatWhat is included →New analyses, by email
The defining moves in business, checked against the record, as they publish.
See Ethical Decision-Making Framework in the wild.
Follow Ethical Decision-Making Framework across the companies and lenses where it actually shaped the strategy — the decision, the rationale, and how it played out.